Sri Balakrishna Rao M v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
writ petition rejected for non-compliance of office objections; office objections cost Advocates' Welfare Fund Rs.2,500; final opportunity 16.02.2026; KSAT Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal Bengaluru Application 78927955/2016 connected 78017842/2016 order dated 13/04/2018 Annexure-B; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; S-KSAT service matter; retired Principals Lecturers Head Masters Head Mistresses Government Pre-University College High School Dakshina Kannada Puttur Sullia Bantwal Mangaluru Bengaluru Mysuru; petitioners Sri Balakrishna Rao M. and others; advocate Rajashekhar V. Burji; AGA V. Shivareddy; bench S.G. Pandit and K.V. Aravind; NC: 2026:KHC:22061-DB; no adjudication on merits; no precedent discussed.
What did the court decide?
The imposition of cost is intended to secure compliance with office objections; paying the cost while failing to comply with the office objections is not accepted.