Writ petition filed in 2025 against a bank, pending for a year, dismissed for non-prosecution after petitioners failed to appear on two consecutive hearings despite prior warning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:33714 WP No. 34805 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 34805 OF 2025 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.251 LIG, PLOT 251, HOUSE NA, KHB COLONY S AND S, 2ND MAIN, MAHADESHWARANAGARA, CMC CHANNAPATNA TOWN, RAMANAGARA-562160.
…PETITIONERS
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJU H.B., ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
THE MANAGER, HDFC BANK, NO.51, HDFC HOUSE, KASTURBA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. (BY SRI. VARUN S., ADVOCATE)
…RESPONDENT
NC: 2026:KHC:33714 WP No. 34805 of 2025
HC-KAR
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing.
Sri.Varun.S., counsel for the respondent has appeared through video conferencing.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 02.07.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioners it was ordered to be listed on 06.07.2026 and it was also made clear that if none appears for the petitioners on the next date of hearing, appropriate orders will be passed.
NC: 2026:KHC:33714 WP No. 34805 of 2025
HC-KAR
The petition is listed today. A perusal of the petition papers would reflect that the petition is filed in 2025. Now we are in 2026. The petition is pending for a year. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition
is dismissed for non-prosecution .
Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/(JYOTI M) JUDGE
MRP
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Nagaraju
B. Roopa
The Manager, HDFC Bank
Jyoti M
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
