Dismissed¶38

Sri.S.M.Chandrappa v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC25 Mar 2026WP/34425/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 34425 of 2014 (LA-BDA); Justice K.S. Hemalekha; order dated 25.03.2026; withdrawal of writ petition by memo; dismissed as withdrawn; land acquisition; Bangalore Development Authority; final notification dated 29.06.2007; Peripheral Ring Road; Sy.No.65 / new Sy.No.65/1, Cheemasandra Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk; Section 18(1)(b), Land Acquisition Act; land acquisition compensation; liberty to approach competent authority.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the writ petition permitted; petition dismissed as withdrawn in view of the memo. ¶38

Sri.S.M.Chandrappa Vs the State of Karnataka — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:17016 WP No. 34425 of 2014

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 34425 OF 2014 (LA-BDA)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI.S.M.CHANDRAPPA SON OF LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.13/3, BASAVANAPURA, SEEGEHALLI MAIN ROAD, K.R PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 049.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

(BY SRI. FAYAZ SAB B G .,ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 4^TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001.

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE - 560 020.

¶15

¶16

NC: 2026:KHC:17016 WP No. 34425 of 2014

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BANGALORE - 560 020.

¶19

THE TAHASILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK, K.R PURAM, BANGALORE - 560 046.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. MANJUNATH B.,AGA FOR R1 & 4; SRI. KESHAV AGNIHOTRI.,ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. B S SACHIN.,ADVOCATE FOR R3)

¶22

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18(1)(B) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 29.6.2007 ISSUED BY THE R-2, FOR ACQUIRING THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES, VIDE ANN-D, AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS AND PASSED WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND AS THE SAME HAS BEEN LAPSEDBY EFFLUX OF TIME AND ETC.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

¶25

NC: 2026:KHC:17016 WP No. 34425 of 2014

¶26

HC-KAR

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed

¶30

a memo seeking to withdraw this writ petition, which

¶31

reads as under:

¶32

" That the Petitioner in the above case most respectfully submits that he has challenged the Final Notification dated 29.06.2007 which was issued for Acquistion of Land bearing Sy.No.65, new Sy.No.65/1 of Cheemasandra Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk acquired for formation of PERIPHERAL RING ROAD. After detailed deliberations the Petitiner herein is willing to receive the Land Acquisiton Compansation. Hence this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner herein to WITHDRAW the above Writ Petition with liberty to approach the competent Authority for redressal of his grievences, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶33

2. The said memo is taken on record.

¶34

NC: 2026:KHC:17016 WP No. 34425 of 2014

¶35

¶36

HC-KAR

¶37