Writ petition seeking direction to the Tahsildar to consider a representation for phodi and durasth of subject land. The court disposed of it, permitting the petitioner to file an online application within two weeks, which authorities must consider in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:27170 WP No. 33917 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.33917 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. INDUMATHI S.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA)
HC-KAR
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.09.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND TO EFFECT PHODI AND ASSIGN SY NO. OR SUB NO.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.
writ petition is with regard to consideration of the representation dated 19.09.2025 (Annexure-J) for conducting phodi and durasth in respect of the subject land.
HC-KAR
the learned counsel appearing for the parties and the learned Additional Government Advocate, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is required to approach the competent authority by filing an online application in the prescribed manner.
submit an online application seeking phodi and durasth in respect of the subject land within an outer limit of two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. If such an application is submitted, the respondentauthorities shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible.
With the above observations, the writ petition stands
disposed of .
SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69
SMT. R. SOWBHAGYA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT
THE TAHSILDAR, RAMANAGARA TALUK
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
