Smt Sreya Anuj Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka

SMT SREYA ANUJ KUMAR D/O SRI.ANUJ KUMAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R.AT NO.1-38, SHREYA FARMS ULAYIBETTU VILLAGE GURUPURA HOBLI MANGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT-574145. REP BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SMT. SHANTHERI D/O SRI.GANAPATHI.B AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R.AT NO.2B-124 SRI. RAMANATHA KRUPA INDIRANAGARA, 6^TH MAIN ROAD 76 BADAGA BETTU VILLAGE UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT-576101. Digitally signed by JUANITA …PETITIONER THEJESWINI (BY SRI. G B NANDISH GOWDA., ADVOCATE) Location: HIGH COURT OF AND: KARNATAKA

¶11

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT DR.B.R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU -560001.

¶12

THE TAHASILDAR SARGUR TALUK, SARGUR -571121.

¶13

2 -

¶14

NC: 2026:KHC:7023 WP No. 3334 of 2026

¶15

HC-KAR

¶16

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS SARGUR TALUK, SAGAR-571121.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP)

¶19

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER LEGAL NOTICE DATED 20.09.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND TO COMPLETE SURVEY PROCEEDINGS AND FIXATION OF HADDU BASTU WITH RESPECT TO LAND BEARING SY.NO.389/599 MEASURING 3 ACRES, SITUATED AT SAGARE VILLAGE, KANDALIKE HOBLI, HD KOTE TALUK, NOW SARAGUR TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for respondents No.1 to 3.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has given representation to respondent No.2 – Tahsildar, Sargur Taluk, for phodi and durasth of his land. Learned Counsel submits that appropriate directions may be given to the concerned respondents to carry out the phodi and durasth.

¶24

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:7023 WP No. 3334 of 2026

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

Learned High Court Government Pleader however submits that normally this Court would direct the parties to file online application for phodi and durasth. However, in respect of granted lands, since the phodi and the durasth have to be conducted simultaneously in respect of all the granted lands, sufficient time may be required to complete the process. Learned High Court Government Pleader submits on instructions that the Sy.No.389/599 of Sagare Village, Kandalike Hobli, H.D.Kote Taluk, now Sargur Taluk, comprises of 108 acres 3 guntas and several grants have been made in the said survey number. Therefore, sufficient time will have to be granted to the respondents to complete the phodi and durasth.

¶27

The learned High Court Government Pleader

¶28

submits on instructions that the process has already begun.

¶29

Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Tahsildar, Sargur Taluk and to respondent No.3-Assistant Director of Land

¶30

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:7023 WP No. 3334 of 2026

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

Records, Sargur, to complete the process of phodi and durasth, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶33

Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.

¶34

Sd/(R DEVDAS) JUDGE

¶35

KLY CT: JL

Smt Sreya Anuj Kumar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Sreya Anuj Kumar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Muddagangamma Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Renukappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri S v Ashwathaiah Vs State of Karnataka

Arunkumar M N Vs the Principal Secretary to

Mr. Dr. Basavaraj P v Vs State of Karnataka

Jayaramappa Vs the Deputy Commissioner