Dismissed¶32

Yashwanth v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC18 Feb 2026WP/3319/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 3319 of 2026 (EDN-RES); decided 18.02.2026 by Ashok S. Kinagi, J.; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on memo filed by counsel; liberty given to pursue W.P. No. 3346 of 2026; petitioner Yashwanth s/o Ashok Kumar, law student, Tumakuru; respondents: State of Karnataka (Higher Education), Karnataka State Law University, Vidyodaya Law College; subject: permission to appear for 1st semester LL.B. examination 06/02/2026 to 13/02/2026; representation dated 30/01/2026 (Annexure-A); Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; withdrawal of writ petition with liberty; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to pursue Writ Petition No.3346 of 2026 ¶32

Yashwanth Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:10114 WP No. 3319 of 2026

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 3319 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

YASHWANTH S/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, RESIDING AT MELEKOTE, WARD NO.11, GANGASANDRA MAIN ROAD, TUMAKURU CITY, MELEKOTE POST, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 101.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R

¶11

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

(BY SRI. M.U. NAREN SHAKTI SWARUP, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M.N. UMASHANKAR, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, VIDHANA SOUDA, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶15

KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY IT'S REGISTRAR, NAVANAGAR,

¶16

HUBBALLI-580 025.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:10114 WP No. 3319 of 2026

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

VIDYODAYA LAW COLLEGE AFFILIATED TO KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, B.H. ROAD, TUMAKURU-572 102.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI./SMT.: MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1; SARITHA KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 (VK NOT FILED); R3 - SERVED)

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO: (1) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 30/01/2026 AT ANNEXURE-A AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO APPEAR FOR THE 1^ST SEMESTER EXAMINATION (SEMESTER 1) SCHEDULED TO BE HELD FROM 06/02/2026 TO 13/02/2026 AS PER THE EXAMINATION HALL TICKET ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; AND ETC.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶26

¶27

NC: 2026:KHC:10114 WP No. 3319 of 2026

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, files a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty to pursue Writ Petition No.3346 of 2026.

¶31

The Memo is placed on record.

¶32

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶33

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶34

¶35

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51

Yashwanth v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yashwanth v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Sanvi Auto Agencies Vs Hero Fincorp Ltd.

M Jyothi Vs Authorized Officer

Sri D M Ramu Vs State Bank of India

Angel College of Nursing Vs the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences

Satchmo Holdings Limited Vs B Abhayraj Shetty

M/S Supreme Traders Vs State Bank of India