Dismissed¶33

Sri Shashidhar N v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC8 Jan 2026WP/31919/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; dismissed as not pressed; party-in-person memo; BDA DS-3 order dated 03.03.2025 sought to be quashed; Article 226 Constitution of India; return of certified/original documents by Registry retaining Photostat copies; Bangalore Development Authority; State of Karnataka; High Court of Karnataka; S Sunil Dutt Yadav; 8 January 2026.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the petition as not pressed upon the petitioner's withdrawal memo, with the Registry directed to return the certified/original documents to the petitioner after retaining Photostat copies for reference. ¶33

Sri Shashidhar N Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:1047 WP No. 31919 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 31919 OF 2025 (BDA)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. SHASHIDHAR N. S/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA A., AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCCUPATION : PRIVATE WORK, NO.848 A-17, BDA 2^ND STAGE, AUSTIN TOWN, BENGALURU -560047.

¶9

Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

SRI. SANTHOSH N. S/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA A., AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCCUPATION : PRIVATE WORK, NO.848 A-17, BDA 2^ND STAGE, AUSTIN TOWN, BENGALURU - 560047.

¶11

SRI. MANJUNATH N. S/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA A., AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION : PRIVATE WORK, NO.848 A-17, BDA 2^ND STAGE, AUSTIN TOWN, BENGALURU - 560047.

¶12

SMT. JAYALAKSHMI N. W/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA A.,

¶13

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:1047 WP No. 31919 of 2025

¶14

HC-KAR

¶15

NO.848 A-17, BDA 2^ND STAGE, AUSTIN TOWN, BENGALURU-560047.

¶16

…PETITIONERS

¶17

(BY SRI. SHASHIDHAR N., PARTY IN PERSON)

¶18

AND:

¶19

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASASOWDA, 4^TH FLOOR, BENGALURU.

¶20

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA), REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HEAD OFFICE, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560020.

¶21

DEPUTY SECRETARY -3, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HEAD OFFICE, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560020.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. A.S. HARISHA, AGA FOR R1)

¶24

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 03.03.2025 PASSED BY THE DS-3, BDA HEAD OFFICE, BENGALURU AND ETC.,

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

¶27

NC: 2026:KHC:1047 WP No. 31919 of 2025

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶30

ORAL ORDER

¶31

The petitioner (party in person) has filed a memo which reads as hereunder:

¶32

"I, begs to Hon'ble court to withdraw my case file and permit me to withdraw the case, (not press) and I pray to give back my all documents, and your Hon'ble court in the interest of justice and equity."

¶33

2. In light of the same, petition is dismissed as

¶34

not pressed. Registry is directed to return the documents i.e., the certified copies or original copies after retaining

¶35

the Photostat copies of the same, for reference.

¶36

Sd/(S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE

¶37

MCR

Sri Shashidhar N v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Shashidhar N v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Best Corrugators Vs Union of India

Sri S N Basavaraju Vs State of Karnataka

M. Narayana Murthy Vs Union of India

Sri v S Paramesh Vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Smt. Narayanamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr Suresh Gowda B Vs the State of Karnataka