Dismissed¶47

M/S Arsis Developers Private Limited v. Sri Krishnappa

Karnataka HC6 Jan 2026WP/31650/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition (GM-CPC) under Articles 226/227 challenging appellate judgment dated 23.10.2024 in M.A.No.134/2023 (IX Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District) was dismissed as withdrawn on petitioner's memo, the underlying suit O.S.No.1074/2023 having been rejected on 20.12.2024 and the petition thereby infructuous. Decided by S.R. Krishna Kumar J. on 06.01.2026 (NC: 2026:KHC:344). No merits adjudicated, no precedent value; keywords: withdrawal, infructuous, quash, M.A.No.134/2023, O.S.No.1074/2023, Bengaluru Rural, Arsis Developers v. Krishnappa.

What did the court decide?

The memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition was taken on record, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶47

M/S Arsis Developers Private Limited Vs Sri… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:344 WP No. 31650 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 31650 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S ARSIS DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY HAVING A REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.52/2B, BESIDES PURVI GREENS HOTEL, BHATTARAHALLI, VIRGO NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 049, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI K PEDDI REDDY.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

(BY SRI.C SHANKAR REDDY., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

SRI KRISHNAPPA, SON OF LATE MUNIKULLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOMMASANDRA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 562 125.

¶15

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:344 WP No. 31650 of 2024

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

SRI VANAJABASAVARAJU, WIFE OF B M BASAVARAJ, DAUGHTER OF LATE Y THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.495, 'SANTRUPTI', 2^ND CROSS, 8^TH MAIN, 3^RD STAGE, 3^RD BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR,

¶18

BENGALURU - 560 076.

¶19

SMT YALE THAMMAIAH NIRMALA, WIFE OF SRI S S PAWAR, DAUGHTER OF LATE Y THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1004, 3^RD MAIN ROAD, 7^TH BLOCK, 2^ND PHASE, NEAR HOSAKEREHALLI CROSS, BSK III STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085.

¶20

SMT PARVATHI KIRAN SHANKAR, WIFE OF S N KIRAN SHANKAR, DAUGHTER OF LATE Y THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 54, 15^TH CROSS, 7^TH BLOCK, 2^ND PHASE NEAR, R T NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 032.

¶21

SRI Y T NARENDRA BABU, SON OF LATE Y THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, 1^ST PHASE, 1^ST STAGE, MANJUNATHA NAGAR, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010.

¶22

¶23

NC: 2026:KHC:344 WP No. 31650 of 2024

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

6. SMT HEMAMALINI K,

¶26

WIFE OF SRI Y T NARENDRA BABU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, 1^ST PHASE, 1^ST STAGE, MANJUNATHA NAGAR, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010.

¶27

SHARATH N YALE,

¶28

DAUGHTER OF SRI Y T NARENDRA BABU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, 1^ST PHASE, 1^ST STAGE, MANJUNATHA NAGAR, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010.

¶29

SIRI N YALE,

¶30

DAUGHTER OF SRI Y T NARENDRA BABU AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.3, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, 1^ST PHASE, 1^ST STAGE, MANJUNATHA NAGAR, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 010.

¶31

ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, HOSAKOTE, BENGALURU - 562114.

¶32

…RESPONDENTS

¶33

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

¶34

¶35

NC: 2026:KHC:344 WP No. 31650 of 2024

¶36

HC-KAR

¶37

QUASH THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.10.2024 MADE IN M.A.NO.134/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT BENGALURU, AS PER ANN-A TO THIS WP AND THEREBY ALLOW THE ABOVE PETITION AND ETC.

¶38

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶39

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

¶40

ORAL ORDER

¶41

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, which reads as under:

¶42

"The petitioner above named submits that suit bearing O.S.No.1074/2023 before the Prl. Senior Civil Judge at Bengaluru Rural District filed by the respondent herein has been rejected on 20.12.2024 and the hence the above petition has became infructuous. Hence, prays to dismiss the above petition as withdrawn in the interest of justice."

¶43