This is an oral order where the High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for non-prosecution, as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners while the respondent appeared.
Disposal of the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:31187-DB WP No. 31198 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO.31198 OF 2024 (GM-CON)
BETWEEN:
5TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU - 560 034. REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER.
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU - 560 034.
HC-KAR
THE PETITIONERS 4 AND 8 ARE REP. BY THEIR GPA HOLDER: M/S ARATTUKULAM DEVELOPERS LLP, BY ITS PARTNER MR. TONY VINDENT, NO. 106/A, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 4TH C CROSS, BEHIND RAHEJA ARCADE, 5TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU - 560 034.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SIDDHARTH SUMAN., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
NC: 2026:KHC:31187-DB WP No. 31198 of 2024
HC-KAR
KARNATAKA
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.537, STURNIDAE STREET, NEPEAN OTTAWA K2J6X1.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. BEENA P K., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR SUCH OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS, QUASHING THE ORDER DATED:09.10.2024 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH) IN EX.PET.47/2024 FILED BY THE DECREE HOLDER (DHR)/RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 71 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019 FOR ATTACHMENT OF THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY AND ARREST AGAINST THE PETITIONERS i.e., ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
NC: 2026:KHC:31187-DB WP No. 31198 of 2024
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
None has appeared on behalf of the appellants in the
first call nor in the revised call.
However, learned counsel for the respondent has put in appearance.
We therefore dismiss this petition for non
prosecution.
Sd/(D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/(T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
DR
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7 ct-vn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India should be dismissed for non-prosecution.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/S. ARATTUKULAM DEVELOPERS LLP
MR. RAVIKUMAR
MR. RATHEESH M.
D K SINGH
T.M.NADAF
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
