Disposed¶4

Sri Huchaiah D v. Govt of Karnataka

Karnataka HC17 Jun 2026WP/30249/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru; WP No. 30249 of 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR); phodi and durast; Sy.No.111, 08 guntas, Ippadi Village, Huthri Durga Hobli, Kunigal Taluk, Tumakuru District; representations dated 12.06.2025 (Annexures-F and F2); application through online portal; consideration in accordance with law within six months; Division Bench order dated 01.09.2025 in Civil Contempt Petition No. 898 of 2025; disposed of by E.S. Indiresh, J. on 17.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to approach the respondent-authorities through the online portal in view of the Division Bench order dated 01.09.2025 in Civil Contempt Petition No. 898 of 2025; any such application to be considered by the respondent-authorities in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, within an outer limit of six months from the date of the application.

Sri Huchaiah D Vs Govt of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶4

Issue for consideration

Whether Respondents No. 2 and 3 ought to be directed to conduct phodi proceedings in respect of Sy.No.111, measuring 08 guntas, situated at Ippadi Village, Huthri Durga Hobli, Kunigal Taluk, Tumkur District, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.06.2025 (Annexures-F and F2) and assign a new survey number in the name of the petitioner.

¶23

Court's answer

The petitioner is permitted to approach the respondent-authorities through the online portal, in view of the order dated 01.09.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this court in Civil Contempt Petition No. 898 of 2025 (Annexure-H).

¶4

Ratio / Principle

If such an application is submitted through the online portal, the same shall be considered by the respondent-authorities in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, within an outer limit of six months from the date of such application made by the petitioner.

¶4

Key takeaways

With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.ratio¶4

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No. 30249 of 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR), filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India: petitioner Huchaiah D. sought a direction to Respondents 2 and 3 (Assistant Director of Land Records, Tumakuru District; Thasildar, Kunigal Taluk) to conduct phodi and durast in respect of Sy.No.111, measuring 08 guntas, situated at Ippadi Village, Huthri Durga Hobli, Kunigal Taluk, Tumakuru District, by considering his representations dated 12.06.2025 (Annexures-F and F2) and to assign a new survey number in his name. E.S. Indiresh, J., relying on the Division Bench order dated 01.09.2025 in Civil Contempt Petition No. 898 of 2025 (Annexure-H), permitted the petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities through the online portal and directed that any such application be considered in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, within an outer limit of six months from the date of the application. Writ petition disposed of.

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:29479 WP No. 30249 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.30249 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. HUCHAIAH D. AGE ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A SEEGAPALYA VILLAGE, IPPADI POST, HUTHRI DURGA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572126.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. RAVIKUMARA B.R., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

GOVT. OF KARNATAKA

¶14

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANASOUEA BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶16

THE ASSISTNT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS (ADLR) TUMAKUKRU DISTRICT TUMAKURU - 572 101.

¶17

THE THASILDAR KUNIGAL TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 572 130.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:29479 WP No. 30249 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA )

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3 TO CONDUCT PHODI PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF SY.NO.111, MEASURING 08 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT IPPADI VILLAGE, HUTHRI DURGA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT, BY CONSIDERING THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DTD. 12.06.2025 (ANNXF1 AND F2) AND ASSIGN A NEW SURVEY NUMBER IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.

¶27

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

¶28

parties.

¶29

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:29479 WP No. 30249 of 2025

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

The grievance of the petitioner in this writ

¶32

petition is with respect to consideration of representations dated 12.06.2025 produced at Annexure- F and F2 seeking to conduct phodi and

¶33

durast in respect of the subject land.

¶34

Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and the learned Additional Government Advocate, the petitioner is permitted to approach the respondentauthorities through the online portal in view of the order dated 01.09.2025 passed by the Division Bench of this court in Civil Contempt Petition No. 898 of 2025 (Annexure-H). If such a application is submitted, the same shall be considered by the respondentauthorities in accordance with law and as

¶35

expeditiously as possible within an outer limit of six months from the date of such application made by the

¶36

¶37

NC: 2026:KHC:29479 WP No. 30249 of 2025

¶38

HC-KAR

¶39

petitioner. With this observation, the writ petition

¶40

stands disposed of.

¶41