Sri K a Venkatesh v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
KIAD Act Section 28(1) and Section 28(4) notifications quashed; partial acquisition of residential flats set aside; K-RIDE Bangalore Sub-urban Railway Corridor Baiyyappanahalli-Chikkabanawara; Survey No.105 Mathikere Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk; Sanath Sadan Apartments; Compensation Resettlement Package dated 31.10.2023 No.K-RIDE/LAQ/CR/03/2021-22 Clause I(d) Article 14 challenge raised but not decided; Section 28(6) price fixation meeting; Section 29(2) compensation Rs.1,62,383/- per square metre; Section 29(4) deposit in Civil Court; KIADB permitted to withdraw deposited compensation from City Civil Court; order expressly non-precedential; policy decision abandoning acquisition; writ petition allowed. NC: 2026:KHC:29300; WP No. 29930 of 2025 (LA-KIADB); decided 16.06.2026.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition allowed; Preliminary Notification No.CI 149 ASPQ 2024 (Annexure-C) dated 07.11.2024 (S.28(1) KIAD Act) and Final Notification No.CI 149 ASPQ 2024 (Annexure-F) dated 07.01.2025 (S.28(4) KIAD Act) quashed in respect of 52.33 square meters in Survey No.105 of Mathikere Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk; Respondent No.2 permitted to withdraw the compensation deposited before the City Civil Court; order declared non-precedential. The Article 14 challenge to Clause I(d) of the CRP and the prayer for acquisition of the entire property were not adjudicated.