Allowed

M/S Sarjan Realities Limited v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC10 Jun 2026WP/26668/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A wind energy company sought a mandamus directing forest authorities to consider its representation for regularization of deviations from demarcated forest land and to process lease transfers. The court held representations must be decided within a reasonable time and directed consideration within eight weeks, without expressing any opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider the representation dated 02.06.2020 (Annexure-A) and pass necessary orders within eight weeks.

M/S Sarjan Realities Limited Vs the State of… — Environment and Pollution | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:28130 WP No. 26668 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 26668 OF 2025 (GM-FOR)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S SARJAN REALITIES LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 5^TH FLOOR, GODREJ ETERNIA A OLD PUNE MUMBAI ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR, PUNE - 411 005, MAHARASHTRA, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY AND LEAD LEGAL MR VINAY KUMAR.

¶10

… PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. ARUN KUMAR K., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI SUNDARA RAMAN M V., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, ROOM NO. 448, 4^TH FLOOR, GATE NO. 2, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶15

THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS KARNATAKA FOREST DEPARTMENT, ARANYA BHAVAN, 18^TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:28130 WP No. 26668 of 2025

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FORESTS MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE, REGIONAL OFFICE (SOUTH ZONE) KENDRIYA SADAN, 4^TH FLOOR, E AND F WINGS, 17^TH MAIN ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034.

¶20

… RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP)

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER AND TAKE EXPEDITIOUS ACTION ON THE DEVIATION REGULARIZATION REPRESENTATIONS/PROPOSALS MADE BY THE PETITIONER ON 02.06.2020 BEARING NO.SRL/KUDURE KONDA27.98 HA/DAVANAGERE/2020-21 FOR KUDREKONDA SITE AT ANNEXURE-A AND TO ALLOW THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FOREST AND CLIMATE CHANGE (MOEF), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DATED 29.01.2018 AND ETC.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

¶26

(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondent Authorities to consider and take expeditious action on the deviation regularization representations/proposals made by the Petitioner on 02.06.2020 bearing No.SRL/Kudure Konda-27.98 ha/Davanagere/2020-21 for Kudrekonda Site at Annexure-A and to allow the same in

¶27

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:28130 WP No. 26668 of 2025

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

accordance with the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF), Government of India, dated 29.01.2018;

¶30

(ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondent Authorities to process and execute the pending Lease Transfers, pursuant to the applications filed by the Petitioner dated 29.05.2009 bearing No.SRL/BLR-Kudurekonda 27.98 ha/09-10 for Kudrekonda Site (Annexure D) , 06.08.2011 for Gangavanasara Site bearing No.SRL/BLR-Gangavanasara 47.73 ha/11-12 ( Annexure N ) and 22.01.2010 for Sogi and Jajjikalgudda sites bearing No.SRL/BLR-Sogi & Jajikal gudda 17.61 ha/08-09 ( Annexure S) in favour of the Petitioner's customers, in a timebound manner;

¶31

(iii) Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶32

The Petitioner is engaged in the business of establishment of Wind Energy Generators/Wind Turbines across the State of Karnataka. Many of these being established in forest areas. Initial permission is obtained from the Forest Department. In respect of three of the projects set up by the petitioner, there are certain deviations from the land demarcated by the Forest Department.

¶33

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:28130 WP No. 26668 of 2025

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

It is in that background, the petitioner had submitted

¶36

the representation dated 02.06.2020 at Annexure-A for the request of the petitioner to be considered in terms of guidelines issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India dated 29.01.2018. The said representation not having been considered, the Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the aforesaid reliefs.

¶37

Whenever any representation is submitted by a citizen or a Company operating in the jurisdiction of a particular Authority, it is required for the Authority to consider the same and pass necessary orders within a reasonable period of time, either accepts or rejects the request made.

¶38

In the present matter, the representation has been submitted on 02.06.2020. No orders have been passed by the respondents till date, either accepting

¶39

5 - NC: 2026:KHC:28130 WP No. 26668 of 2025

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

or rejecting the request made by the Petitioner. As

¶42

such, this Court passes the following:

¶43

ORDER

¶44

i) Writ petition is allowed .

¶45

ii) Respondents are directed to consider the representation dated 02.06.2020 at

¶46

Annexure-A and pass necessary orders within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶47

iii) It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

¶48

SD/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

¶49

KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 81

M/S Sarjan Realities Limited v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Sarjan Realities Limited v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Krishnamurthy S P Vs the State of Karntaka

M/S Resonators Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Sln Cleaning and Services Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Hamaslekha v Vs the Tahsildar

Uco Bank Vs State of Karnataka

Ganadeesha Vs State of Karnataka