Mr M C Ashok v. M/S Hdfc Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge Karnataka HC order (Lalitha Kanneganti, 25.03.2026) disposing of WP No. 25485 of 2024 (GM-RES): writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 against a 05.12.2016 Crl.Misc.No.58/2016 order (Senior Civil Judge & CJM, Chikmagalur) and a 02.01.2024 demand notice by Recovery Officer-I, DRT-I in HDFC Bank recovery against schedule property, alleging violation of SARFAESI Act 2002 and RDB Act 1993; petition held non-maintainable owing to effective alternative remedy before the DRT; disposed with liberty to approach the DRT and benefit of Section 14 Limitation Act preserved; pending I.As. closed; OTS of Rs.42.00 lakhs (representation dt. 20.08.2021) not acted upon. Relevant to searches on writ petitions against DRT/SARFAESI recovery steps being redirected to the DRT with limitation-period protection.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before the DRT, with the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act; all pending interlocutory applications in the writ petition stand closed. No relief granted on the prayers to quash the impugned order/notice or to direct acceptance of the OTS amount.