M/S Rai Builders and Developers v. Mr. K P Ibrahim

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2026WP/2532/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; M.G.S. Kamal, J.; WP No. 2532 of 2022 (GM-CON); decision dated 03.06.2026; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; petitioner's memo dated 03.06.2026; M/s Rai Builders and Developers (Sadananda Rai) represented by Chandranath Ariga K., Advocate; v. K P Ibrahim and D K District Consumer Commission, Mangaluru; Complaint/CC No. 204/2020; impugned order dated 05.01.2022 (Annexure-E) per prayer, dismissal recorded as 05.02.2022 per memo; consumer dispute; no adjudication on merits; no precedents discussed; no monetary award.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner's memo dated 03.06.2026 seeking dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous was placed on record and accepted. ¶30-31

M/S Rai Builders and Developers Vs Mr. K P Ibrahim — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:25954 WP No. 2532 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2532 OF 2022 (GM-CON)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S RAI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SHAAN ARCADE D NO. 23-3-282/12 NEAR KASIYA HIGH SCHOOL MARNAMIKATTE MANGALURU - 575 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. SADANANDA RAI S/O LINGAPPA RAI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA

¶14

MR. K P IBRAHIM S/O PUTTHABBABEARY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT KARIYANGALA HOUSE POST. POLALI - 574 219 BANWAL TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT.

¶15

D K DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION MANGALURU - 575 005 BY ITS CHAIRMAN

¶16

…RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TOQUASH THE ORDER DATED: 05.01.2022 PASSED BY THE R-2 IN COMPLAINT NO.204/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-E, ALLOW THE

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:25954 WP No. 2532 of 2022

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

MEMO FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R-2 DATED: 05.01.2022 AND DISMISS THE COMPLAINT NO.204/2020 BEFORE THE R-2 OR DIRECT THE ABOVE COMPLAINT TO BE TRANSFERRED TO THE STATE CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM, BENGALURU AND ETC.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed a

¶24

memo dated 03.06.2026 seeking to dismiss the writ petition as having become infructuous. The memo reads as under:

¶25

"MEMO

¶26

The petitioner respectfully submits that the 2^nd respondent by its order dated 05.02.2022 dismissed the complaint in CC No.204/2020. Therefore, the present writ petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous in the interest of justice and equity”

¶27

¶28

NC: 2026:KHC:25954 WP No. 2532 of 2022

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30