Petitioner sought appointment as Junior Lab Technician under a 2012 recruitment notification, claiming parity with an appointee under an order in a related writ petition. The court held she was a fence-sitter who never challenged the selection list for over seven years and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:34158 WP No. 25178 of 2023
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO. 25178 OF 2023 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. SHEELA S W/O RAJENDRA PRASAD M AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS SHIVARAMA NILAYA 5TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN OPP.SHARADA VIDYAPEETA SCHOOL BYATARAYANAPURA MYSORE ROAD BENGALURU-560026 (BY SRI. SHAILENDRA M R., ADVOCATE)
…PETITIONER
AND:
THE BANGALORE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE K R ROAD, FORT
NC: 2026:KHC:34158 WP No. 25178 of 2023
HC-KAR
BENGALURU-560002
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR AND DEAN
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PANINI ALANGAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) QUASH BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER, AS THE CASE MAY BE, THE ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. BEM YU SOM / SOM / COURT/17160/2023-24 DATED 10/08/2023 OF THE RESPONDENT AT ANNEXURE-K. b) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR APPOINTMENT AS JUNIOR LAB TECHNICIAN AND INCLUDE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE FINAL SELECTION LIST TO JUNIOR LAB TECHNICIAN AND APPOINT THE PETITIONER TO THE POST OF JUNIOR LAB TECHNICIAN TO THE NOTIFIED VACANCY OF G.M. (WOMEN) IN THE RECRUITMENT NOTIFICATION DATED 28/12/2012 AT ANNEXURE-A WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS, INCLUDING THE MONETARY BENEFITS. GRANT SUCH OTHER SUITABLE RELIEFS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEE S FIT, IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2026:KHC:34158 WP No. 25178 of 2023
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the
following reliefs:
petition are as follows:
HC-KAR
The respondent-Institute has issued a
notification/advertisement inviting an application for the several post. Pursuant to the notification the petitioner applied for the post of the Junior Lab technician vide notification dated 28.12.2012. On 24.03.2016, a provisional list/merit list was published. On 25.06.2016, an appointment orders were issued to 9 persons, though 10 posts were advertised. One of the candidate approached this Court in W.P.No.36710/2016. This Court, vide order dated 17.12.2021, allowed the writ petition and directed respondent No.1 to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as a Medical Record Technician, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible and include the name of the petitioner in the final list of the Medical Record Technician and appoint the petitioner to the post of Medical Record Technician to the notified vacancy of (GM) under the recruitment notification dated 28.12.2012 with all consequential benefits except the arrears of salary. The said order was challenged by the respondent in
HC-KAR
W.A.No.132/2022. The said writ appeal came to be
dismissed vide judgment dated 07.03.2022. On the basis of the order passed in W.P.No.36710/2016, the petitioner therein was appointed under the impugned notification. Hence, this writ petition.
3. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, the
respondent has not filed the statement of objections.
petitioner and also learned counsel for the respondent.
the similarly placed petitioner under the same notification has directed the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner therein for the post of the Medical Record Technician. He submits that the petitioner is entitled for
NC: 2026:KHC:34158 WP No. 25178 of 2023
HC-KAR
similar relief on the ground of parity. Hence, on these grounds, he prays to allow the writ petition.
submits that the final selection list was issued in the year 25.06.2016 and the writ petition is filed in 2023. There is a delay of more than 8 years in filing the writ petition. Hence, on the ground of delay and laches, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed and he also submits that in a similar circumstances, the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.24372/2022 and connected matter disposed of the writ petition vide judgment dated 22.08.2024. Hence, on these grounds, he prays to dismiss the writ petition.
submissions of the learned counsel for the parties.
HC-KAR
application for several posts in the respondent-Institution. Pursuant to the said notification, the petitioner has applied for the post of Junior Lab technician. The petitioner participated in the recruitment process and the petitioner was unsuccessful. The respondent has published the final
selection list dated 25.06.2026. One of the similarly placed petitioner approached this Court in W.P.No.36710/2016, wherein the petitioner therein has applied for the post of Medical Record Technician. This Court, vide order dated 17.12.2021, allowed the writ petition and directed the respondent-Institution to consider the case of the petitioner, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible and to include the name of the petitioner in the final selection list of the Medical Record Technician and appoint the petitioner to the post of Medical Record Technician to be notified vacancy of GM (women) under the recruitment notification dated 28.12.2012 with all consequential benefits except the arrears of salary. The Institution, aggrieved by the order passed in the aforesaid
HC-KAR
writ petition, preferred a writ appeal in W.A.No.132/2022.
The said writ appeal came to be dismissed vide order dated 07.03.2022. After the disposal of the said writ appeal, the petitioner filed this writ petition on 03.11.2023 claiming the same relief based on the order passed in W.P.No.36710/2016. The similar issue arises before the Division Bench in W.A.No.24372/2022. The Division Bench, vide judgment dated 22.08.2024, recorded its finding, which reads as follows:
“15. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner-KPSC that the private respondent herein is not a party in Writ Petition No.50737 of 2013 and connected petitions or has he approached the Tribunal challenging the selection Notification. He is just a fence-sitter who was silently watching the proceedings and now wants to come under the umbrella of the benefit extended to the Petitioners in Writ Petition No.50737 of 2013 and connected petitions, which is not permissible. He submits that it is clear from the order passed in Writ No.50737 of 2013 and connected petitions is to extend the benefit to the petitioners therein for considering their candidature for selection in open competition category and further to accommodate them in the vacant sanctioned posts. It was further made clear that if no sanctioned posts are available, then to create supernumerary posts to accommodate them. The private respondent herein is not a party to the Writ Petition No.50737 of 2013 and connected petitions. It is well-settled that fence-sitters cannot be allowed to
HC-KAR
raise the dispute or challenge the validity of the order after its conclusion. Those persons who approach the Court on the ground that their counterparts who had approached the Court succeeded in their efforts, then such employees cannot claim that the benefit and they would be treated as fence-sitters.”
succeeded in their efforts, then such employee cannot claim that the benefit and they would be treated as a fence-sitters.
NC: 2026:KHC:34158 WP No. 25178 of 2023
HC-KAR
W.P.No.36710/2016. Considering the judgment rendered
by the Division Bench in the case of MS. MANJUSHREE.K , in W.P.No.24372/2022, I do not find any grounds to entertain the writ petition.
ORDER
ii. Pending application/s, if any, shall stand
disposed of.
Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SSB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a fence-sitter who did not participate in earlier proceedings or challenge the selection list can claim parity with a successful litigant under the same recruitment notification.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.36710/2016Referred¶8
W.A.No.132/2022Referred¶8
Ms. Manjushree.KFollowed¶10
W.P.No.24372/2022 (Ms. Manjushree.K)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sheela S
The Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute represented by its Director and Dean
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
