Borrowers and a guarantor sought to quash DRT-II Bengaluru orders and set aside sale certificates and a subsequent sale deed arising from a Bank of Baroda SARFAESI action. The High Court declined writ jurisdiction, holding an alternate remedy by way of DRAT appeal under Section 18 SARFAESI, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:25980 WP No. 24836 of 2023
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M
WRIT PETITION NO. 24836 OF 2023 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PETITIONERS NO. 2 AND 3 ARE R/AT NO.116, 5TH MAIN, 2ND STAGE, BRINDAVAN EXTENSION, MYSURU-570020.
…PETITIONERS
NC: 2026:KHC:25980 WP No. 24836 of 2023
HC-KAR
(BY SRI. MOHAMMAD ATIF, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJENDRA M.A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, BANK OF BARODA, (ERSTWHILE VIJAYA BANK), VIJAYANAGARA BRANCH, NO.441, 504, NEW KALIDASA ROAD, VIJAYANAGARA 1ST STAGE, MYSURU-570017.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SHETTY VIGNESH SHIVARAM, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Mohammed Atif., counsel on behalf of Sri.Rajendra.M.A., for the petitioners and Sri.Shetty Vignesh Shivaram., counsel for the respondent have appeared in person.
2. The petition is filed seeking following reliefs:
HC-KAR
Because of dismissal the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/(JYOTI M) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained against the DRT order when an appeal lies to the DRAT under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/S. Pushpanjali Traders
Mr. D.R. Keshava Murthy
Mrs. Amitha Keshava Murthy
Mr. Kantharaja Maasti
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda
Jyoti M
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
