Disposed

Sri Manjunath v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC16 Sept 2026WP/24550/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Tahsildar to mutate his name in revenue records based on a final decree in O.S. No. 61/2017. The High Court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to make a representation to the Tahsildar with the decree copy, and ordered the Tahsildar to consider it and pass appropriate orders within four months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to make representation to Tahsildar with decree copy; Tahsildar to consider and pass orders within four months of receipt.

Sri Manjunath Vs State of Karnataka — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:50598 WP No. 24550 of 2026

¶3

CNR: KAHC010537362026

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.24550 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. MANJUNATH S/O LATE MUNIRAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT BANDENALLASANDRA VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 560 105.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. RUPESH R., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶14

Digitally signed by REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY CHAYA S A Location: HIGH DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE COURT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶15

THE TAHSILDAR

¶16

TALUK OFFICE, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560 106.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA )

¶19

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

NC: 2026:KHC:50598 WP No. 24550 of 2026

¶22

CNR: KAHC010537362026

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 (TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK) TO MUTATE THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN REVENUE RECORDS WITH RESPECT OF THE PROPERTIES ALLOTTED TO HIM UNDER THE FINAL DECREE IN O.S. NO. 61/2017 (REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NO. ANK-1-06581-2020-21) WITHIN FOUR WEEKS (ANNEXURE - A

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

The learned Additional Government Advocate

¶27

accepts notice for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶28

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

¶29

parties.

¶30

In this writ petition, the petitioner has

¶31

sought a direction to the respondent No. 2 to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records, in

¶32

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

NC: 2026:KHC:50598 WP No. 24550 of 2026

¶35

CNR: KAHC010537362026

¶36

terms of the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 61/2017 (Annexure-A).

¶37

In view of the above, the petitioner is

¶38

directed to make a representation to respondent No. 2 along with a copy of the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 61/2017. If such a representation is made

¶39

by the petitioner, respondent No. 2 shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of the representation.

¶40

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed

¶41

of .

¶42

Sd/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶43

¶44

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20

Sri Manjunath v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Manjunath v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases