Venugopal. B. R. v. the Assistant Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bangalore; NC: 2026:KHC:32281; WP No. 24430 of 2022 (GM-RES); Justice M.G.S. Kamal; decided 30.06.2026. Petitioner Venugopal B.R.; respondents: Assistant Commissioner/President, Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Tribunal, Tumakur Sub Division (R1), and Smt. Gangamma (R2). Filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 09.06.2022 in Case PAAPOSAM AND SENIOR NAA.RA.KA.SAM.68/21-22 (Annexure-G). Petition withdrawn as infructuous by memo; dismissed as withdrawn at preliminary hearing ('B' Group). Advocates: Sri Virupakshaiah P H. (petitioner); Sri Mahantesh Shettar, AGA (R1); Sri T.M. Vijayakumar (R2). No merits adjudicated, no precedent discussed, no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
No relief on merits; withdrawal of the writ petition permitted and the petition dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous, following the petitioner's memo