Hotel Kamadhenu v. Hdb Financial Services Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal of writ petition as infructuous at the instance of petitioners' counsel with recorded undertaking not to seek review or modification; Articles 226/227 Constitution of India; GM-DRT category; Karnataka High Court, single judge (Jyoti M, J.), order dated 22-07-2026; respondent HDB Financial Services Limited appeared through counsel as caveator/respondent; pending interlocutory applications disposed of; no ruling on merits, no quantum, no precedents discussed.
What did the court decide?
Acting on counsel for the petitioners' conscious decision that the petition had become infructuous (with the undertaking not to seek review or modification), the Court dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous. ¶¶39