Disposed¶46

Teerthesh S R v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC18 Mar 2026WP/23780/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru), WP No. 23780 of 2024 (LB-RES), neutral citation NC: 2026:KHC:15854, decided 18.03.2026 by M.I. Arun J. Mandamus; encroachment of public road; Sy.No.74, Angarekhanahalli Village, Sampige, Turuvekere Taluk, Tumkur; representations dated 15.03.2021 and 18.03.2021; Annexures D, E, F; Grama Panchayat Sampige; Zilla Panchayath Tumkur; removal of encroachment attributed to respondents 6 and 7 (Mahalingaiah, Shivanna); disposal with direction to consider representations and do the needful within three months; Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to consider the request of the petitioners and do the needful within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order. ¶46

Teerthesh S R Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:15854 WP No. 23780 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 23780 OF 2024 (LB-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

TEERTHESH S.R. S/O RENUKA PRASAD S.S. AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS ANGAREKHANAHALLI SAMPIGE AT POST DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR KARNATAKA 572 225. (BONAFIED MEMBER OF THE INDIAN NAVY)

¶9

Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

S.S. RENUKA PRASAD S/O SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SAMPIGE AT POST TURUVEKERE TALUK SAMPIGE, TUMKUR KARNATAKA 572 225.

¶11

(BY SRI. SAMPATH KUMAR A.V., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY PWD DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560 001.

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT

¶16

TUMKUR, KARNATAKA 572 225.

¶17

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:15854 WP No. 23780 of 2024

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

TAHSILDAR TURUVEKERE TALUK TURUVEKERE 572 227.

¶20

PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER GRAMA PANCHAYAT SAMPIGE HOSAHALLI TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA 572 225.

¶21

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYATH, TUMKUR KARNATAKA 572 101.

¶22

MAHALINGAIAH S/O SANJEEVAIAH MAJOR R/AT SITE NO.24 ANGAREKHANAHALLI SAMPIGE AT POST DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA 572 225.

¶23

SHIVANNA S/O BAJAPPA MAJOR R/AT SITE NO.21 ANGAREKHANAHALLI, SAMPIGE AT POST, DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR, KARNATAKA 572 225.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;

¶26

SMT. JYOTI Y. KATAGAR, ADVOCATE FOR

¶27

SRI. A.NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5; V/O DTD 18/03/2026 NOTICE TO R6 AND R7 D/W)

¶28

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R1

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:15854 WP No. 23780 of 2024

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

TO 5 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DTD 15.03.2021 AND 18.03.2021 VIDE ANNX-D, E AND F., AND ETC.

¶33

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶34

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

¶35

ORAL ORDER

¶36

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have made a representation to respondent Nos.4 and 5 alleging that a public road has been illegally encroached in Sy.No.74 of Angarekhanahalli Village, Sampige Post, Dandinashivara Hobli, Turuvekere Taluk, Tumakur District. As no action is taken, the present writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

¶37

"1. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 to 5 to consider the representations dated 15.03.2021 and 18.03.2021 vide ANNEXURE - D, E and F in the interest of justice and equity.

¶38

2. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 to 5 to remove the encroachment of road measuring 20 feet made by respondent No.6 and 7 after holding an enquiry and spot inspection in the interest of justice and equity.

¶39

3. To pass any such order as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity".

¶40

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:15854 WP No. 23780 of 2024

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

Learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5 upon

¶43

instructions submits that necessary inspection will be conducted

¶44

and if it is found that the encroachment does exist the same shall be recovered in accordance with law.

¶45

3. Submission is placed on record.

¶46

Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos.4 and 5 to consider the request of the petitioners and do the needful within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶47

SD/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE

¶48

GPG

¶49

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22

Teerthesh S R v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Teerthesh S R v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Saroja Biradar Vs Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (Bbmp)

Mr. K N Lakshmi Janardhan Vs Commissioner

Mrs Veena Santhosh Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Shashikala S Vs State of Karnataka

Mr. Akash Tahsildar Vs the Chief Commissioner

Sri. Anand Babu v Vs the Assistant Executive Engineer