Dismissed¶¶33

Vijay Anand v. State by Hsr Layout P.S

Karnataka HC7 Jan 2026WP/23648/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC 2026 writ petition dismissed as infructuous; quash remand order dated 9.12.2021, IV Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Bengaluru, Crime No.221/2021, HSR Layout Police Station; FIR under IPC Sections 406, 420 r/w Section 34; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution r/w Section 482 CrPC; investigation completed, charge sheet filed, CC No.9319/2023 registered 18.04.2023; petitioners in police custody; petitioner counsel absent, no representation; Annexure-C.

What did the court decide?

This court dismissed the writ petition as it had been rendered infructuous, following the report that investigation in Cr.No.221/2021 was completed and the charge sheet filed with CC No.9319/2023 registered on 18.04.2023. ¶¶33

Vijay Anand Vs State by Hsr Layout P.S — Cheating and Forgery | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:872 WP No. 23648 of 2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 23648 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

VIJAY ANAND AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O CHANDRA SHEKHAR RESIDING AT: NO.4A, PANDYAN STREET, VILLIVAKKAM, CHENNAI-600107

¶10

NARESH KUMAR @ NARESH S/O PALLINI SWAMY AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS RESIDING AT 7/60, VANIYAR STREET, TIRUVALAR KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT CHENNAI - 603 312

¶11

Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

HARSHINI D/O SAMPATH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.23, C J COLONY, 6^TH STREET, ROYAPURAM, CHENNAI-600013

¶13

NIVETHA D/O KAMARAJ AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.9, 5^TH STREET NEW KAMRAJ NAGAR, ROYAPURAM CHENNAI - 600 013 (ALL ARE IN POLICE CUSTODY)

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SMT. SHAHIDA KHANAM J., ADVOCATE (AB))

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:872 WP No. 23648 of 2021

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

AND:

¶20

STATE BY HSR LAYOUT P.S., REP BY HCGP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 (BY SMT. SOWMYA .R., HCGP)

¶21

…RESPONDENT

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.9.12.2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED IV ADDL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU ON REMAND APPLICATION IN CRIME NO.221/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.,

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. No

¶26

representation.

¶27

Heard Smt. Sowmya R., learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent - State and perused the materials on record.

¶28

Learned HCGP submits that the petitioners have sought for quashing FIR in Cr.No.221/2021 of HSR Layout Police Station, registered for the offence punishable under Sections

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:872 WP No. 23648 of 2021

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

406 and 420 R/w Section 34 of IPC. Now the investigation is completed and the charge sheet is filed. CC No.9319/2023 is registered on 18.04.2023. Therefore, the petition is rendered infructuous.

¶33

Hence, the petition is dismissed as the same has been rendered infructuous.

¶34

Sd/(M G UMA) JUDGE

¶35

BH CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36

Vijay Anand v. State by Hsr Layout P.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Anand v. State by Hsr Layout P.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri K v Naidu Vs the State by

Mr. Ratish Kumar Moorthy Vs Smt. Mihika Chakraborty

Sanna Reddy Prasad Reddy Vs State of Karnataka by

Ameen Khan Vs State of Karnataka

Mansoor M. K. Vs State by Madikeri Town P.S.

Raju v @ Ring @ Trp Raju Vs Mahesh R S S/O Not Known