Dismissed¶45

Sri M Sunil Kumar v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC6 Jul 2026WP/2093/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; Writ Petition No. 2093 of 2025 (LB-RES); decided 06-07-2026 by Justice B M Shyam Prasad; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on petitioner's memo; matter settled; challenge to Sub Registrar endorsement dated 26-09-2024 (Annexure-H) and Chikkaballapura Urban Development Authority endorsement dated 24-10-2024 (Annexure-K); prayer for provisional khata for vendors R-6 to R-9 and provisional release order on accepting pro rata charge; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; no merits adjudicated; no cases cited; no quantum awarded.

What did the court decide?

The Court accepted the petitioner's withdrawal memo, the learned counsel having submitted on query that the matter is settled, and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No question was decided on merits. ¶45

Sri M Sunil Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:33835 WP No. 2093 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 2093 OF 2025 (LB-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. M. SUNIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O LATE M. MADANLAL JAIN, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.1143, PRESTIGE SOUTH RIDGE APARTMENTS, HOSAKEREHALLI, BANASHANKARI 2nd STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. UMESH M N., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

¶16

CHIKKABALLAPURA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, HAVING OFFICE AT: CITRUS CITY MEADOWS, 4TH SECTOR, TUMAKALAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER

¶17

THE TOWN PLANNING MEMBER CHIKKABALLAPUR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:33835 WP No. 2093 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

HAVING OFFICE AT: CITRUS CITY MEADOWS, 4TH SECTOR, TUMAKALAHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101.

¶22

THE SUB REGISTRAR, OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, OPPOSITE TO DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX, AT CHIKKABALLAPURA - 562 101.

¶23

KUPPA HALLI GRAMA PANCHAYAT KUPPAHALLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 103. REPRESENTED BY ITS PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

¶24

SRI. DUVURU MADHUSUDHAN REDDY S/O LATE VENKATASUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT NAIDUPET, NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶25

SRI. DARSI VENKATARAMAIAH AT DARSI VENKATARAMANAIAH, S/O TIRUPATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT MALLAM (VIA) NAIDUPET, NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶26

SRI. NELAVALLI VENKATA KRISHNA @ NELAVALLI VENKATA KRISHNAMA NAIDU, S/O PEDDABALA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NAIDUPET NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶27

SRI. MODUGALA RAMANAIAH S/O PEERAIAH,

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:33835 WP No. 2093 of 2025

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT MAHADEVAIAH, SULURPET, NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶32

MR. D B SRINATH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O SRI D M BALAPPA, NO.566/15, VAPASANDRA, BEHIND MILK DAIRY, CHICKBALLAPURA TOWN AND DISTRICT, CHICKBALLAPURA - 562 101.

¶33

…RESPONDENTS

¶34

(BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R-1 AND R-4; SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R-2; SRI. M S DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R-5; R-6, R-7, R-8, R-9 ARE SERVED)

¶35

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. NIL ISSUED BY R4 DATED 26-09-2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-H. QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. CHI.NA.A.PRA/VINYASA/36/2015-16/1097 DATED 2410-2024 ISSUED BY R2 VIDE ANNEXURE-K. DIRECTING THE R2 AND R3 TO EFFECT PROVISIONAL KHATA IN THE NAMES OF THE R-6 TO 9 THE VENDORS OF THE PETITIONERS HEREIN AND PROVISIONAL RELEASE ORDER IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE SITES AFTER ACCEPTING PRO RATA CHARGE.

¶36

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶37

¶38

NC: 2026:KHC:33835 WP No. 2093 of 2025

¶39

HC-KAR

¶40

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶41

ORAL ORDER

¶42

The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo for withdrawal of the petition which reads as under:

¶43

" The petitioner does not want to further prosecute the above case. In this view of the matter, the petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above writ petition and the same may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶44

WHEREFORE, the petitioner respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity."

¶45

When queried, the learned counsel submits that the matter is settled. As such, the memo is accepted and the

¶46

petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶47

Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

¶48

Sri M Sunil Kumar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri M Sunil Kumar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Hemavathi S Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Munirathnamma Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Renukamma Vs the Commissioner

Sri. V.N. Chethan Vs the State of Karnataka

Shri. Venkoba Rao Shivaram, Vs the Chief Commissioner Gba

Shivanandaiah Vs Grater Bangalore