Subbarao Subedar v. the State of Karnataka and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka; petition ordered as 'having become infructuous'; memo by respondent's counsel — petition spent itself, would not survive for consideration; petitioner's counsel did not dispute memo; disposition verb illegible; case number, parties, advocates, bench and dates unrecoverable (corrupted custom font encoding); digital signature Varsha N Rasalkar.
What did the court decide?
In its operative paragraph the Court recorded, as to 'this petition', a final order in the form 'this petition is ... as having become infructuous'; the operative disposition verb is illegible due to source corruption. ¶34
������������������� ���������������������
- 1 -
��������
��������������������������������
�����������������
��� ����!��������� � �"�����������"#������
�������
�������$����%���&�!�������� ����!�����"�����
��������������������������������'!� �!(
���������
����������������������� ���������������� ��������������������� ������������������� ����������������������������������� ����������������������������������
������������
������������������������������������������
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition survived for consideration, having regard to the memo filed by learned counsel for the respondent(s) stating that the petition had 'spent itself' (decoded from corrupted source).medium confidence¶29
The court heldIn its operative paragraph the Court recorded, as to 'this petition', a final order in the form 'this petition is ... as having become infructuous'; the operative disposition verb is illegible due to source corruption.ratio
Procedural history
How this case reached the court
- Prior proceeding
[Decoded from corrupted custom-encoded source; evidence quote is the raw encoded text] Learned counsel for the respondent(s) (a short fragment carrying the respondent number(s) is illegible) filed a memo stating that the petition would not survive for consideration, the petition having spent itself.¶29
- Prior proceeding
[Decoded from corrupted custom-encoded source; evidence quote is the raw encoded text] Learned counsel for the petitioner was present and does not dispute the said memo.¶30
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/201279/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court