Dismissed¶40

Sri. Pillegowda v. Channabyrappa

Karnataka HC2 Jul 2026WP/19738/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 19738 of 2021 (GM-CPC); Article 227 Constitution of India; Pillegowda v. Channabyrappa, Krishnappa, Anjinamma and Rathanamma; challenge to order dated 01.10.2021 in O.S.No.73/2007 of Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Hosakote; application dated 06.09.2021 (Annex-C); memo for withdrawal by counsel Ajay R. Anneppanavar; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on 02.07.2026 by Vijaykumar A. Patil, J.; no merits adjudication, no precedent value on the underlying dispute.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. No ruling on the merits of the challenge to the order dated 01.10.2021 in O.S.No.73/2007. ¶40

Sri. Pillegowda Vs Channabyrappa — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:33071 WP No. 19738 of 2021

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 19738 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI PILLEGOWDA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/A HASIGALA VILLAGE AND POST SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TLAUK BENGALURU RURAL DIST - 562 129

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. AJAY R. ANNEPPANAVAR, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

1. CHANNABYRAPPA

¶15

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O LATE MUNIBYRAPPA

¶16

R/AT HASIGALA VILLGE AND POST

¶17

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶18

HOSKOTE TLAUK

¶19

BANGALORE RURAL DIST PIN 562 114

¶20

2. KRISHNAPPA

¶21

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE MUNIBYRAPPA R/AT HASIGALA VILLAGE AND POST HOSKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DIST PIN - 562 114

¶22

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:33071 WP No. 19738 of 2021

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

SMT. ANJINAMMA W/O GOPAL D/O LATE MUNIBYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS MEDAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST VEMGAL HOBLI, KOLAR DIST PIN - 563 103

¶25

SMT. RATHANAMMA W/O VENKATESHAPPA D/O LATE MUNIBYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS CHOLAPPANAHALLI BEGUR POST SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TLAUK BANGALORE RURAL DIST PIN - 562 114

¶26

…RESPONDENTS

¶27

(BY SRI. K.S. NARESH SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4)

¶28

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 01.10.2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (Jr.Dn) AND JMFC, HOSAKOTE, IN O.S.NO.73/2007 PRODUCED AT ANNX-E AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION DTD. 06.09.2021 PRODUCED AT ANNX-C & ETC.

¶29

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶30

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:33071 WP No. 19738 of 2021

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo

¶36

seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

¶37

The memo reads as under:

¶38

" The undersigned counsel has been instructed by the petitioner to withdraw the present petition as he longer wishes to contest the same and accordingly the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶39

In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition

¶40

is dismissed as withdrawn .

¶41

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

¶42

SHS

¶43

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6

Sri. Pillegowda v. Channabyrappa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Pillegowda v. Channabyrappa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri.Lalith Mohan Tayal Vs Dr.S.Bore Gowda

Akash M Vs Manjunath U M

Smt Lakshmamma Vs Sardar Sabi

Sri Dinesh Vs Sri Ramaiah

Mr. B N Prabhakar Vs Mr K R Narayanswamy

Sri. Vijayakumar Kurle Vs Sri. Manohar Raju