Smt Hemalatha Nayak @ Vijayalaxmi Shenoy v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging an order passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted that all dues prompting the secured creditor's action had been repaid, rendering the petition infructuous. The High Court recorded this submission and dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous