The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the filing of a petitioner's memo stating that the prayer sought became futile.
None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:50104 WP No. 19311 of 2022
CNR: KAHC010446112022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 19311 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SOMASHEKARAIAH .R.P, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MAIN BRANCH, NEAR KSRTC DEPOT, TUMAKURU -572101
REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, MANAGER
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SOHANI HOLLA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R1 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE E-AUCTION SALE NOTICE DATED 23.8.2022 FIXING THE PUBLIC AUCTION ON 26.9.2022 IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY UNDER ANNEXURE-K; AND ETC.
Digitally Signed By: SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM Verified
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:50104 WP No. 19311 of 2022
CNR: KAHC010446112022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
stating that the prayer sought for in the petition has become infructuous. Memo is taken on record.
dismissed as having become infructuous.
Digitally Signed By: SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM Verified
(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
ALB
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. VENUGOPAL Y R
THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER CANARA BANK
CANARA BANK
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
