Dismissed¶¶35

Smt.Lakshmamma v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC7 Apr 2026WP/18807/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007; Section 9 petition; Deputy Commissioner Appellate Tribunal Tumkur; Assistant Commissioner Tribunal; MAG (10/211/2021) order dated 06.07.2022; Annexure-B; Articles 226 and 227 writ petition (GM-RES); dismissed as infructuous; out-of-Court settlement memo; all I.As. closed; Karnataka High Court 2026; Lalitha Kanneganti J.; WP No. 18807 of 2022; Tumkur; senior citizen maintenance dispute settled.

What did the court decide?

On a memo filed by the petitioner's counsel stating that the disputes between the parties were settled out of Court, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous and all interlocutory applications in the petition were ordered closed. ¶¶35

Smt.Lakshmamma Vs the Deputy Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:19037 WP No. 18807 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 18807 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT.LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT APPASANDRA DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI HADAVANAHALLI POST TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT -572 211

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SMT.SHARANYA H.R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.GANGADHARAIAH A.N., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS

¶16

AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT 2007) TUMKUR DISTRICT TUMKUR-572 211

¶17

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT 2007 TUMKUR DISTRICT TUMKUR -572 211

¶18

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:19037 WP No. 18807 of 2022

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

SRI.RANGASWAMY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: INDIAN RAILWAYS SUBRAMANYANAGAR CHURCH STREET ARASIKERE TOWN AND TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT

¶21

SRI.KRISHNAMURTHY S/O LT.NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT APPASANDRA VILLAGE DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI HADAVANAHALLI POST TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKRU DISTRICT -572 211

¶22

SRI.NATARAJU S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT APPASANDRA VILLAGE DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI HADAVANAHALLI POST TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKRU DISTRICT -572 211

¶23

SRI.RAVICHANDRA S/O LT.NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT APPASANDRA VILLAGE DANDINASHIVARA HOBLI HADAVANAHALLI POST TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKRU DISTRICT -572 211

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI.MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SMT.ARCHANA MURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R6)

¶26

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED

¶27

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:19037 WP No. 18807 of 2022

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 IN MAG (10/211/2021, DATED: 06.07.2022 CONFIRMING THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEXURE-B. CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007.

¶30

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶31

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the disputes between the parties are settled out of the Court and the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.

¶34