Disposed¶37

Sri Lakshmipathi v. Union Bank of India

Karnataka HC7 Jul 2026WP/18691/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC single-judge oral order disposing WP 18691/2026 (GM-DRT): mandamus sought under Article 226 to make Union Bank of India consider petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure-C); Bank to furnish statement of account and valuation slip within one week; bench: Jyoti M, J.; no precedent cited, no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent Bank to furnish the statement of account and valuation slip to the petitioner within one week from receipt of the certified copy of the order. ¶37

Sri Lakshmipathi Vs Union Bank of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:33922 WP No. 18691 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 18691 OF 2026 (GM-DRT)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. LAKSHMIPATHI, S/O. SRI. MALLAPPA, AGED 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.11, DHANAMITTENAHALLI VILLAGE, BHASEHITTYHALLI POST, SHIDLAGATTA TALUK-562105.

¶9

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SANDHYA U. PRABHU, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER/ MANAGER, ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH, BENGALURU NORTH, NO.1234, 1ST FLOOR, 4TH MAIN, OPP. CHANDRA LAYOUT BUS STOP, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560040.

¶13

…RESPONDENT

¶14

(BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:33922 WP No. 18691 of 2026

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

Sri.Harish Ganapathy counsel on behalf of Smt.Sandhya U.Prabhu, for the petitioner and Sri.Vignesh Shetty, counsel for the respondent appeared in person.

¶22

Sri.Harish Ganapathy., counsel submits that he has instruction from the advocate on record to make submission in the matter.

¶23

Submission is noted.

¶24

Sri.Vignesh Shetty, counsel undertakes to file power on behalf of respondent. Submission is noted. Office is directed to accept the vakalath that would be filed by the counsel for the respondent.

¶25

This petition is filed seeking following reliefs:

¶26

(a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 15.04.2026 given by the petitioner produced at Annexure-C.

¶27

(b) Grant any other relief as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case

¶28

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:33922 WP No. 18691 of 2026

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

including awarding costs, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶31

Counsel for respondent on instruction submits that

¶32

the Bank is ready to furnish the statement of account and also the valuation slip to the petitioner.

¶33

Sri.Harish Ganapathy., counsel submits that would suffice the petitioner's request and he will not insist the furnishing of the documents as detailed in Annexure-C.

¶34