Dismissed¶¶43

Mr Gowni Sridhar Goud v. the Karnatak Real Estate

Karnataka HC22 Jun 2026WP/18553/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court writ petition dismissed as withdrawn: challenge to K-RERA (Karnatak Real Estate Regulatory Authority) order dated 08/06/2026 in Complaint No. CMP/1495/2026 abandoned via memo dated 22.06.2026 on the ground that the Authority had already passed final order and the petition 'does not survive for consideration'. Prayers were certiorari and mandamus under Articles 226/227. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suraj Govindaraj; counsel: Ms. Padmaja Pattanakude for Sri. Srinivas V (petitioners), Sri. K. Rajashekar for R1; notice to R2/R3 dispensed with. Search terms: WP No. 18553 of 2026, GM-RES, CMP/1495/2026, K-RERA Bench 5, memo for withdrawal, certiorari, no merits decided, limited citational value.

What did the court decide?

None; petition dismissed as withdrawn on the memo dated 22.06.2026. ¶¶43

Mr Gowni Sridhar Goud Vs the Karnatak Real Estate — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:30966 WP No. 18553 of 2026

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 18553 OF 2026 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR. GOWNI SRIDHAR GOUD AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, SON OF MR. GOWNI DAYANAND GOUD, RESIDING AT PLOT NO. 41, HUDA ENCLAVE ROAD, MO. 70, JOURNALIST COLONY, NEAR ANDHRA JYOTHI OFFICE, SHAKPET, HYDERABAD, JUBILEE HILLS, TELANGANA - 500 033.

¶9

M/S. SHREYA HOMES,

¶10

Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN, HAVING PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT PLOT NO. 5, KANNAMANGALA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560 067 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. GOWNI SRIDHAR GOUD.

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

(BY MS. PADMAJA PATTANAKUDE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRINIVAS V, ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

THE KARNATAK REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY,

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:30966 WP No. 18553 of 2026

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

NO. 1/14, 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶19

MRS. CHNCHU BABY RANI WIFE OF MR. GUDAPATI VENKATESHWARA RAO AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO. D 16/1/A OPPOSITE MERIDIAN ELITE ROAD PANCHAVATHI COLONY, SHUTTLE COURT /PARK TELANGANA - 500 089.

¶20

MRS. GOWNI ANISHA, WIFE OF MR. GOWNI SRIDHAR GOUD AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT PLOT NO. 41, HUDA ENCLAVE ROAD, MO. 70, JOURNALIST COLONY, NEAR ANDHRA JYOTHI OFFICE, SHAKPET, HYDERABAD, JUBILEE HILLS, TELANGANA - 500 033.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 DISPENSED WITH)

¶22

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 08/06/2026 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.

¶23

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:30966 WP No. 18553 of 2026

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

1 IN COMPLAINT BEARING NO. CMP/1495/2026 VIDE

¶26

ANNEXURE - A AND ETC.,

¶27

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

¶28

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶30

ORAL ORDER

¶31

Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

¶32

a. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, to set aside the Impugned Order dated 08/06/2026 passed by the Respondent No. 1 in Complaint bearing No. CMP/1495/2026 vide Annexure- A;

¶33

b. Consequently, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to dismiss the complaint filed by the Respondent No. 2 before the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Bench 5) by allowing the Applications filed by the Petitioners in Complaint bearing No. CMP/1495/2026;

¶34

c. In alternative to the prayer (b) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent No.1 to consider the Applications along with objections vide filed by the Petitioners Complaint bearing No. CMP/1495/2026 vide Annexure K, L & M.

¶35

d. Grant any other relief that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interests of justice and equity.

¶36

A memo for withdrawal dated 22.06.2026 has been filed signed by the counsel for the petitioner, which reads as under:

¶37

¶38

NC: 2026:KHC:30966 WP No. 18553 of 2026

¶39

HC-KAR

¶40

"The counsel for the petitioners most humbly as follows::

¶41

That the petitioners have filed the present petition assailing the Impugned Order dated 08.06.2026 passed by Respondent No.1 in Complaint bearing No.CMP/1945/2026 vide Annexure-A. However, the Respondent No.1 herein has already passed final order in the aforesaid complaint, as such, the present petition does not survive for consideration.

¶42

In view of the same, the present petition may be disposed."

¶43

Accepting the said memo and the submission of the counsel for the petitioners, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶44

Sd/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

¶45

GJM

¶46

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

Mr Gowni Sridhar Goud v. the Karnatak Real Estate

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Gowni Sridhar Goud v. the Karnatak Real Estate

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Subhashree Saha Vs Deputy Commissioner

Sri. P. T. Subhashchandra Bose Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Arindam Deb Vs Deputy Commissioner

Sri Sukumar Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr Javeed @ Abdul Javeed @ Vaddar Javeed Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt B Prema Vs Deputy Commissioner