Smt Sharadamma v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Tahsildar to consider their representation dated 18.04.2026. The High Court directed respondent No.3 (the Tahsildar) to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within four weeks of receiving a certified copy of the order, and disposed of the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Directed respondent No.3 (Tahsildar, Jagaluru Taluk) to consider the representation dated 18.04.2026 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within four weeks from receipt of a certified copy of the order.