Disposed

The Hi-Tech Iti v. the Directorate General

Karnataka HC3 Jul 2026WP/17547/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An ITI sought a mandamus directing the Commissioner/Director of Employment and Training to consider its representation seeking permission to upload Formative Assessment marks and attendance on the SIDH portal. The Government Advocate undertook to have the representation considered, and the court disposed of the petition with a direction to decide it by a fixed date.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No. 3 directed to dispose of Annexure-V and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law on or before 06.07.2026.

The Hi-Tech Iti Vs the Directorate General — Education and Admissions | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:33279 WP No. 17547 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 17547 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

THE HI-TECH ITI BELLARY ROAD, PAVAGADA TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 561 202. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. NAVEEN J.N, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SHILPABAI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL MINISTRY OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, ROOM NO. 102, 1ST FLOOR, EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGE BUILDING, PUSA CAMPUS, PUSA AREA, NEW DELHI - 110 012.

¶15

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SKILL DEVELOPMENT ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INDUSTRIAL TRAINING, MULTI STORIED BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶16

THE COMMISSIONER / DIRECTOR FOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:33279 WP No. 17547 of 2026

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT, KAUSHALYA BHAVAN, DAIRY CIRCLE, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 029.

¶21

THE JOINT DIRECTOR (TRAINING) AND EX-OFFICIO JOINT APPRENTICE ADVISOR DIVISION OF BENGALORE (E AND T), KOUSHALYA BHAVAN, DAIRY CIRCLE, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 029.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. SADHANA S. DESAI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. SKANDA R.K. RAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R4)

¶24

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R3 TO PERMIT THE STUDENTS OF THE PETITIONER INSTITUTION TO APPEAR IN THE ENSUING EXAMINATION COMMENCES FROM 06.07.2026 TO 10.06.2026 AS PER ANNX-W LIST BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION MARKED AT V AND VI RESPECTIVELY TO THE WP AND ETC.,

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking for

¶28

a mandamus directing respondent No. 3 to consider the representation dated 25.05.2026, wherein, the petitioner

¶29

requested respondent No. 3 to give permission to upload

¶30

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:33279 WP No. 17547 of 2026

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

the Formative Assessment marks and attendance also in

¶33

SIDH portal. The respondents did not consider the representation submitted by the petitioner, hence, this Writ Petition.

¶34

2. Learned Government Advocate submits that if

¶35

reasonable time is granted, respondent No. 3 will consider Annexure –V and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶36

3. In view of the submissions made by the learned

¶37

Government Advocate, I proceed to pass the following:

¶38

ORDER

¶39

(i) The writ petition is disposed of,

¶40

(ii) Respondent No.3 is directed to dispose of Annexure –V and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law on or before 06.07.2026.

¶41

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶42

BVK; List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24

The Hi-Tech Iti v. the Directorate General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Hi-Tech Iti v. the Directorate General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chikkagovinda Vs Govinda

Sri M D Gopal Vs the Director (a and Hr) Kptcl.

Sri.Vamshi Krishna B.M Vs Jyothi Public School

K. L. J. a. Kiran Babu Vs the Management of

Sri. Beeraiah Vs Sri. Gangaiah

P S Shivakumariah Vs the Management of Taralabalu