Sri Narayana Reddy v. Mr Mohammed Khasim Jane @ Mohammed Khasim Saheb
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; WP No. 16457 of 2022 (GM-CPC); Narayana Reddy and another v. Mohammed Khasim Jane and others; decided 18 February 2026 by Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju; writ petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution; challenge to order dated 27.07.2022 of VIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH15) in O.S.No.3571/2013 allowing I.A.No.10 under Order XXVI Rule 4A CPC for appointment of Advocate Court Commissioner for further deposition and cross-examination of PW-1; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; no ruling on merits.
What did the court decide?
As none appeared for the petitioners (there being no presence on the last date of hearing either), the writ petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. The merits of the challenge to the impugned order were not adjudicated.