Dismissed¶40

Smt Radhamma W/O Omkarappa v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC21 Jul 2026WP/16150/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; dismissed as infructuous; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; Karnataka State Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes; No.JAMEENU/11/2021; Annexure-H; Tarikere Taluk; Chikkamagaluru; SC/ST commission proceedings; M.G.S. Kamal; WP 16150/2022.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw; writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous ¶40

Why is it important?

Smt Radhamma W/O Omkarappa Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:37323 WP No. 16150 of 2022

¶3

CNR: KAHC010362682022

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 16150 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. RADHAMMA W/O OMKARAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS SMT GANGA

¶10

D/O OMKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/A GOPALA VILLAGE AND POST LAKKAVALLI HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK-577 144 CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. GURURAJ. R.,ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶16

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 20TH AND 21ST FLOOR V V TOWERS(MAIN) DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI VASANTH NAGAR BENGALURU-560 001

¶17

KARNATAKA STATE COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES 14/3, NEAR RESERVE BANK NRUPATHUNGA ROAD

¶18

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:37323 WP No. 16150 of 2022

¶21

CNR: KAHC010362682022

¶22

BANGALORE-560 001 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER

¶23

THE TAHASILDAR TARIKERE TALUK TARIKERE-577 228 CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT

¶24

JAYALAKSHMI H D/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED MAJOR GOPALA VILLAGE AND POST LAKKAVALLI HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK-577 144 CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI.C.JAGADEESH.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI.K.CHANDRAMOHAN.,ADVOCATE FOR R2; R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶27

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN NO.JAMEENU/11/2021 INITIATED BY THE R4 BEFORE R2 AS PER ANNEXURE-H IS ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW AND ETC.,

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶30

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:37323 WP No. 16150 of 2022

¶33

CNR: KAHC010362682022

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated

¶36

21.07.2026 seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, which reads

¶37

as under:

¶38

" The Petitioner submits that the above writ petition have been rendered infructuous. Hence, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court kindly be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition in the interest of justice and equity."

¶39

Memo is placed on record.

¶40

In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed

¶41

as having become infructuous.

¶42

Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶43

SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21

Smt Radhamma W/O Omkarappa v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Smt Radhamma W/O Omkarappa v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. H K Srinath, Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

R Chalimeswamy Vs State of Karnataka

R Jeevith Vs Mahila Co. Operative Bank

Sri Tabrez Khan Vs Union of India

Smt. Bhayamma Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Papanna T Vs the Deputy Commissioner