Smt. Ratnamma v. Canfin Homes Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
NC: 2026:KHC:25349 | WP No. 16053 of 2026 (GM-DRT), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, order dated 01-06-2026, Jyoti M, J. Petitioners: Smt. Ratnamma (w/o late Yogesh), Sri. Venkatesh Y.S., Sri. Pratap Y.S. and Smt. Priyanka (children of late Yogesh), residents of Shikaripura, Shivamogga - counsel Sri. H.S. Prashanth. Respondent: Canfin Homes Limited, non-banking finance company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, represented by its Authorised Officer Sri. Arun Kumar J.M. - counsel Sri. K.V. Lokesh (respondent also a caveator). Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking certain reliefs (unspecified); dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo; pending interlocutory applications disposed of. Keywords: withdrawal, memo, caveat, DRT, NBFC, Canfin Homes.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn: the oral submission and memo of counsel for the petitioners were placed on record, counsel having taken a conscious decision to withdraw and having stated that, if an order was passed, the petitioners shall not seek review or modification of the order.