M/S. Radhe Labs Vs the State of Karnataka

¶1

1 -

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:13335 WP No. 15327 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 15327 OF 2025 (GM-KIADB)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

M/S. RADHE LABS PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN NO.33/A, SHANIMAHATMA TEMPLE COMPOUND, R.K.LAYOUT, K.G. NAGARA BENGALURU SOUTH, GAVIPURAM EXTENSION, BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU - 560 019 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETORIX SMT. PALLAVI B.S AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT FLAT NO.220, RAMANJI FORT HOUSE APARTMENT, BALAJI LAYOUT NEAR TATA NAGAR, KODIGEHALLI BENGALURU - 560 092.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

(BY SRI UDAY K.S, ADV.)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶13

THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT NO. 49, 4TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVANA BENGALURU - 560 001

¶14

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:13335 WP No. 15327 of 2025

¶15

HC-KAR

¶16

REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER EXECUTIVE MEMBER.

¶17

THE JOINT DIRECTOR INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT D.C. OFFICE BUILDING, BANGALORE RURAL DEVANAHALLI, DODDABALAPURA MAIN ROAD BANGALORE RURAL - 562 110.

¶18

ASSISTANT SECRETARY - 5 KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT, NO.49, 4TH FLOOR KHANIJA BHAVANA, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER EXECUTIVE MEMBER.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R-1 & R-3; SRI VASANTHA, ADV., FOR R-2 & R-4)

¶21

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FILED PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-D1 DTD 20.04.24 FOR ALLOTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PLOT.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

The captioned petition is filed seeking a direction

¶26

against the respondents to consider petitioner's application

¶27

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:13335 WP No. 15327 of 2025

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

vide Annexure-D1 dated 20.04.2024 for allotment of a

¶30

industrial plot.

¶31

Heard learned counsel appearing for the

¶32

petitioner, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 4 and learned AGA appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 3.

¶33

The petitioner–enterprise intends to establish a

¶34

new Research and Development facility for developing innovative pharmaceutical compounds under the name and style M/s. Radhe Labs. Respondent No.2 issued a Notification dated 25.01.2024 inviting applications for allotment of industrial plots. In the said notification, it is indicated that an extent of 61.45 acres has been earmarked for allotment to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other eligible categories.

¶35

The petitioner asserts that the competent committee, upon scrutiny of the petitioner’s proposal in its meeting held on 27.02.2024, approved the project

¶36

4 -

¶37

NC: 2026:KHC:13335 WP No. 15327 of 2025

¶38

HC-KAR

¶39

submitted by the petitioner and recommended allotment of a 0.25 acre industrial plot in the ITIR, Devanahalli General Industrial Area. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner submitted an online application dated 20.04.2024 before respondent No.2 seeking allotment of the said extent of land. The petitioner further contends that, in addition to the online application, a separate representation was also submitted to respondent No.1 requesting allotment of 0.25 acres of land along with the supporting documents.

¶40

The petitioner further submits that, in compliance with the allotment rules, it has deposited 10% of the tentative allotment price towards Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) amounting to Rs.9,18,000/- on 08.05.2024. Despite submission of the application and payment of the requisite EMD, the petitioner contends that the respondents have not taken any decision on the application. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the petitioner’s application

¶41

5 - NC: 2026:KHC:13335 WP No. 15327 of 2025

¶42

HC-KAR

¶43

dated 20.04.2024 (Annexure–D1), the present petition is filed.

¶44

Learned counsel appearing for respondent

¶45

Nos.2 and 4, on instructions, submits that the petitioner’s application would be considered strictly in accordance with law and that appropriate orders would be passed, provided reasonable time is granted by this Court.

¶46

Recording the said submission made on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 4, this Court proceeds to pass the following order:

¶47

ORDER

¶48

(i) The writ petition is allowed in part ;

¶49

(ii) The respondents are directed to consider the petitioner’s application dated 20.04.2024 (Annexure–D1) seeking allotment of an industrial plot.

¶50

(iii) While considering the said application, the respondents shall strictly adhere to the

¶51

6 -

¶52

NC: 2026:KHC:13335 WP No. 15327 of 2025

¶53

HC-KAR

¶54

applicable allotment rules and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within an outer limit of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶55

SD/(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE

¶56

CA

¶57

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51

M/S. Radhe Labs v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Radhe Labs v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.M. Nagarathna Vs Smt Divya M P

Puttaraju. C Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Manjunatha Sports and Cultural Association Vs State of Karnataka

Nadeem Pasha Vs the Passport Officer

Sri Shabbir Pasha Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Varalakshmi Vs the Sub Registrar