Dismissed¶¶33

M/S. Srinidi Bar and Restaurant v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC3 Mar 2026WP/15302/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 15302 of 2020 (T-RES); M/s. Srinidi Bar and Restaurant v. State of Karnataka (Finance Secretary), State of Karnataka (Excise), Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, DCCT (Audit) 6.8 DVO-06, Karnataka State Breweries Corporation; dismissal on withdrawal memo; Karasamadhana Scheme 2023; endorsement dated 9.6.2020; assessment year 2013-14; Annexure-K; Articles 226 and 227; Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav; decided 03-03-2026.

What did the court decide?

No relief on merits; petition dismissed pursuant to the memo seeking withdrawal. The order does not expressly record whether liberty to apply under the Karasamadhana Scheme 2023 (requested in the memo) was granted. ¶¶33

M/S. Srinidi Bar and Restaurant Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:12919 WP No. 15302 of 2020

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 15302 OF 2020 (T-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S. SRINIDI BAR AND RESTAURANT 235/1, JALAHALLI CROSS, T.DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 073 (REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI.K.KUSHAL)

¶10

… PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. ATUL K. ALUR., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS Digitally signed FINANCE SECRETARY, by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, COURT OF VIDHANA SOUDHA, KARNATAKA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY REVENUE SECRETARY, KARNATAKA STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶15

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:12919 WP No. 15302 of 2020

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, VANIJE THERIGE KARYALA-1, KALIDAS ROAD, GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 009.

¶18

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT) 6.8 DVO-06, KIADB BUILDING, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA PEENYA 2^ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560 058.

¶19

KARNATAKA STATE BREWERIES CORPORATION

¶20

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR/ COMPANY SECRETARY, 4^TH FLOOR, TTMC A BLOCK, BMTC BUILDING, KH ROAD, SHANTINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027.

¶21

… RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. K. HEMAKUMAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI ANNAMALAI, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

¶23

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 9.6.2020 ISSUED BY THE R-4 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND ETC.

¶24

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶26

¶27

NC: 2026:KHC:12919 WP No. 15302 of 2020

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo

¶31

which reads as hereunder:

¶32

"As per the instructions, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the above appeal. Liberty may be granted to file application under Karasamadhana Scheme 2023 , in the interest of justice and equity."

¶33

In light of the memo filed, petition is dismissed .

¶34

SD/(S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE

¶35

M/S. Srinidi Bar and Restaurant v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Srinidi Bar and Restaurant v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Mylarappa Vs the State of Karnataka

K.S.Naganna Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Munegowda N Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S. Hyperartho Industries Vs the Assistant Commissioner Commercial Taxes (AUDIT)-3.7, DGSTO-03

M/S Mahalakshmi Agencies Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Sri Guru H M Vs Bangalore Development Authority