Writ petition filed by land owners to quash a report and direct authorities to place grievances before a committee. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel was absent on both hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 1461 OF 2024 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024
HC-KAR
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, NOW BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT. ALL ARE REPRESENTED BY SHRI. M. SRINVIAS, S/O SHRI M RAMARAJ, THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER OF LAND OWNERS OF LAND BEARING SY NO.65/3, SITUATED AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. H.N. BASAVARAJU, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024
HC-KAR
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.G.S. ARUNA, HCGP FOR R1 SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED REPORT DATED:18.01.2023 IN No.KNKC No-93/2022 (DASARAHALLI) AS PER ANNEXURE-D AND ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT No.2 AND 4 TO PLACE THE GRIEVANCES OF THE LAND OWNERS/ PETITIONERS AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND C1 BEFORE THE COMMITTEE FOR FRESH CONSIDERATION WITH A DIRECTION TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES FORMULATED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WA NO.2624/2005 (BDA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS REPORTED IN ILR 2006 KAR PAGE No.318 AS WELL AS THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE HON'BLE APEX COURT PASSED IN BONDU RAMASWAMY CASE REPORTED IN (2010) 7 SCC 129 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
NC: 2026:KHC:22019-DB WP No. 1461 of 2024
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)
Learned counsel for the petitioner was not present in
the first round when the matter was called. He is not present in the second round when the matter is taken up at 4:20 pm. Therefore, we have no option but to dismiss
the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(D K SINGH) JUDGE
Sd/(T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing a report regarding land acquisition grievances.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WA NO.2624/2005 (BDA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS REPORTED IN ILR 2006 KAR PAGE No.318Referred¶47
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHRI. M. MUNIRAJU
SHRI. RAVI
SHRI. MANJUNATH
SHRI. GOWRISHA
SHRI. GOWDARAJA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
D K SINGH
T.M.NADAF
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
