Dismissed

The General Manager v. Sri Harisha

Karnataka HC17 Sept 2026WP/14397/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner insurance company filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order of the Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Holalkere, and to allow its application under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. The petitioner subsequently filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, which the court allowed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending IAs disposed of.

The General Manager Vs Sri Harisha — Motor Accident Claims | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

NC: 2026:KHC:50955 WP No. 14397 of 2024

¶4

CNR: KAHC010286612024

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 14397 OF 2024 (GM-AC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

THE GENERAL MANAGER BHARATHI AXA GENERAL INS.CO.LTD NOW KNOWN AS ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD ABOVE HERO HONDA SHOW ROOM BANNIGIDA STOP, GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI, NOW REP BY THE MANAGER BHARATHI AXA GENERAL INS.CO.LTD NOW KNOWN AS ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD 9TH FLOOR, THE ESTATE 121 DICKENSON ROAD, M.G. ROAD BENGALURU 560 042

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. A N KRISHNA SWAMY.,ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

SRI HARISHA S/O KALLESHA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O GUNDERI KAVAL HOLALKERE TALUK 577520

¶14

P PAPAIAH S/O PAPANNA

¶15

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:50955 WP No. 14397 of 2024

¶18

CNR: KAHC010286612024

¶19

R/O HALIYURU KURUBARAHALLI CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DIST 577501

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. SIDDAPPA B M., ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2 SERVED)

¶22

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER AS PER ANNEXURE-D DATED 21/03/2024 PASSED BY SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND AMACT, HOLALKERE ON APPLICATION BEARING NO. 2 FILED UNDER SECTION 5 OF LIMITATION ACT AND TO ALLOW IA NO. 1 FILED BY PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(d) READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC, READ WITH SECTION 166 (3) OF IMV ACT IN MVC NO. 1037/2023.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated

¶27

10.09.2026 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, which reads as under:

¶28

"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶29

The petitioner respectfully submits seeking leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above writ petition as not pressed. Wherefore, the above writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.

¶30

Bangalore Sd/Dated 10.9.2026 Advocate for the petitioner

¶31

Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA

¶32

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

NC: 2026:KHC:50955 WP No. 14397 of 2024

¶35

CNR: KAHC010286612024

¶36

In view of the same, the petition is dismissed as

¶37

withdrawn.

¶38

Pending IAs., if any, stand disposed of.

¶39

Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA

¶40

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

¶41

ND List No.: 3 Sl No.: 10

The General Manager v. Sri Harisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The General Manager v. Sri Harisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases