Dismissed¶37

Sri. M. Raju v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC1 Apr 2026WP/14352/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition — WP No. 14352 of 2025 (KLR-RES), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, decided 01-04-2026 by Justice R Devdas. Challenge under Articles 226/227 to the Assistant Commissioner's order dated 23.04.2025 in RA(A).No.105/2025 (Annexure-A) concerning Anekal Taluk land revenue matters was abandoned as not pressed via memo dated 13.03.2026; petition dismissed as withdrawn. No issues framed, no cases cited, no merits holding; citable only for the fact of withdrawal/dismissal, not for any legal proposition.

What did the court decide?

None on merits. Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed pursuant to petitioners' memo dated 13.03.2026; memo taken on record subject to all just exceptions; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶37

Sri. M. Raju Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:17869 WP No. 14352 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 14352 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI. M. RAJU S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS

¶8

SRI. M SRINIVASAIAH S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

¶9

SRI. H M MUNIKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

¶10

SRI. H M SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

¶11

Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

ALL ARE R/AT-H HOSAHALLI VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.

¶13

…PETITIONERS

¶14

(BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR V, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:17869 WP No. 14352 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVANA K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.

¶21

THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT – 562 106.

¶22

SRI. RAMACHANDRA S/O LATE MADDURAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/AT – H.HOSAHALLI VILLAGE HENNAGARA POST JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT – 562 106.

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR 1 TO 3)

¶25

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 AND BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED.23.04.2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2. IN RA(A).NO.105/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

The petitioners and the learned Counsel for the petitioners have filed a memo dated 13.03.2026 seeking

¶30

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:17869 WP No. 14352 of 2025

¶32