Disposed¶43

Sri. Shailendrakumar D.R., v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 – Section 28(4)

Karnataka HC3 Jun 2026WP/14084/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

KIADB land acquisition compensation; Section 28(4) Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act 1966; notification dated 18.03.2025; Sy.No.150 Hulikunte Village, Doddaballapura Taluk; mandamus to consider representations dated 03.01.2026 and pass award; WP No.14084 of 2026 (LA-KIADB); High Court of Karnataka; Justice R. Nataraj; decided 03.06.2026; three-month compliance direction; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India.

What did the court decide?

Direction (mandamus) to respondent No.3 to consider the representations dated 03.01.2026 (Annexures-H and J), pass an appropriate award and pay compensation in accordance with law; compliance ordered within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. ¶43

Sri. Shailendrakumar D.R., Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:26029 WP No. 14084 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 14084 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. SHAILENDRAKUMAR D.R., S/O. LATE V. RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

¶10

SRI. PUTTAANJINAPPA S/O. LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶11

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT HULIKUNTE VILLAGE, DODDABELAVANGALA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561203

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

(BY SRI. SHARAN N.MAJAGE, ADVOCATE)

¶14

Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

AND:

¶16

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001

¶17

KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER, KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001

¶18

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-2, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:26029 WP No. 14084 of 2026

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

NO.14/3, 1^ST FLOOR, CFC BUILDING, MAHARSHI ARAVINDA BHAVAN, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SMT. CHANDINI S., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1;

¶24

SRI. H.L.PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3)

¶25

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS DATED-03.01.2026 AS PER ANNEXURES-H AND J AND ETC.

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

The petitioners have sought for a writ in the nature of

¶30

mandamus to direct respondent No.3 to consider their representations dated 03.01.2026 and to pay compensation in respect of acquisition of land in Sy.Nos.150 of Hulikunte Village, Doddabelavangala Hobli, Doddaballapura Taluk measuring 04 acres each.

¶31

(i) The petitioners contend that they are the owners of the aforesaid properties, which were acquired by respondent Nos.2 and 3 for the formation of an industrial area

¶32

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:26029 WP No. 14084 of 2026

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

in terms of a notification bearing No.s¹L 29 J¸ï¦PÀÆå 2024 dated

¶35

18.03.2025 issued under Section 28(4) Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966. The petitioners contend that they are entitled to compensation in respect of the acquisition. However, the respondents have not taken any steps to determine and disburse the compensation, which forced the petitioners to submit individual representations dated 03.01.2026.

¶36

(ii) The petitioners contend that even after receipt of representations and lapse of substantial time, the respondents have not taken any steps to determine and disburse the compensation. The petitioners are therefore before this Court seeking for a direction to the respondents to pass an award and pay compensation in accordance with law.

¶37

Learned counsel for the petitioners reiterated the above contentions and submitted that a direction be issued to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioners.

¶38

¶39

NC: 2026:KHC:26029 WP No. 14084 of 2026

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submitted that if reasonable time is granted, respondent Nos.2 and 3 will take steps to pass an award and disburse the compensation in accordance with law.

¶42

In view of the aforesaid submission, this petition is

¶43

disposed off directing respondent No.3 to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 03.01.2026 and pass an appropriate award and pay compensation in accordance with law.

¶44

This shall be complied within a period of three

¶45

months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶46

Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE

¶47

¶48

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51

Sri. Shailendrakumar D.R., v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Shailendrakumar D.R., v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Muniyamma Vs the Special Land Acqusition Office

Mr. N. B. Prabhakar Vs Assistant Commissioner and

Sri. a. Nagesh Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri M M Prasanna Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Sri Ramachandra Rexins Pvt. Ltd. Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Krishnaiah Alias Krishnappa Vs the State of Karnataka by Its Secretary