Dismissed

The Divisional Manager v. H O Darshan

Karnataka HC17 Sept 2026WP/13901/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner insurance company filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Holalkere. The petitioner subsequently moved a memo seeking leave to withdraw the petition as not pressed. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending interlocutory applications disposed of.

The Divisional Manager Vs H O Darshan — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

NC: 2026:KHC:50944 WP No. 13901 of 2024

¶4

CNR: KAHC010241282024

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 13901 OF 2024 (GM-AC)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NO. 1335/1, 1ST FLOOR, C AND D BLOCK, PANCHAMANTHRA ROAD, KUVEMPU NAGARA, MYSORE-570 023, NOW REP. BY THE MANAGER, BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., GOLDEN HEIGHTS, 4TH FLOOR, NO.1/2, 59TH C CROSS, 4TH M BLOCK, RAJAJI NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010, COMPANY REGISTER UNDER SECTION 21 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. A N KRISHNA SWAMY.,ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

H O DARSHAN S/O. H. E. ONKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, HANUMALI VILLAGE, MINOR, REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, H. E. ONKARAPPA, S/O. LATE ESHWARAPPA,

¶15

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:50944 WP No. 13901 of 2024

¶18

CNR: KAHC010241282024

¶19

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, HANUMALI VILLAGE, RAMAGIRI HOBLI, HOLALKERE TALUK-577 526.

¶20

THE PRINCIPAL RAGHAVENDRA INDEPENDENT SCIENCE COLLEGE, ANANTHA SEVASHRAMA, MALLADIHALLY, HOLAKERE TALUK-577 526.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. SHIVAKUMARAPPA T C.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI. T.M. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶23

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER AS PER ANNEXURE-D DTD 06.02.2024 PASSED BY SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, HOLALKERE ON APPLICATION BEARING NO.1/2024 FILED UNDER SECTION 5 OF LIMITATION ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND TO ALLOW IA.NO.2/2024 FILED BY PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(d) R/W SEC.151 OF CP, R/W SEC.166(3) OF IMV ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-C IN MVC NO.1062/2023.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 10.09.2026 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, which reads as under:

¶28

Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA

¶29

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:50944 WP No. 13901 of 2024

¶32

CNR: KAHC010241282024

¶33

"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶34

The petitioner respectfully submits seeking leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the above writ petition as not pressed. Wherefore, the above writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.

¶35

In view of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶36

Pending IAs., if any, stand disposed of.

¶37

Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA

¶38

(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE

¶39

List No.: 3 Sl No.: 0

¶40

The Divisional Manager v. H O Darshan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Divisional Manager v. H O Darshan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases