The Divisional Manager v. Ashwini
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner insurance company filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking to quash an order passed by the Senior Civil Judge and MACT, Holalkere, and to allow an interlocutory application. The petitioner subsequently moved a memo seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of all pending interlocutory applications.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending interlocutory applications disposed of.