Dismissed¶29

Smt. Kanupriya Bhartia v. Mr. Pranay Bhartia

Karnataka HC18 Jun 2026WP/13567/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; WP No. 13567 of 2022 (GM-RES); Kanupriya Bhartia v. Pranay Bhartia, Prakash Bhartia, Meena Bhartia, Gunjan Goyal and Avinash Goyal; direction sought to III Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court, Bangalore for expeditious disposal of interlocutory applications in C.Misc.No.188/2019; petition dismissed as infructuous (Crl. Misc. no.188/2019 dismissed as withdrawn per memo of respondents 1 and 3); Justice Ravi V Hosmani; decided 18-06-2026; Articles 226 & 227, Constitution of India.

What did the court decide?

Taking on record the memo filed by learned counsel for respondents 1 and 3, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, Crl. Misc. no.188/2019 having been dismissed as withdrawn. ¶29

Smt. Kanupriya Bhartia Vs Mr. Pranay Bhartia — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:30159 WP No. 13567 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13567 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. KANUPRIYA BHARTIA W/O PRANAY BHARTIA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A NO B2-103, SNN RAJ ETTERNISA SY NO.146/1, 147/1, 147/2 HARLUR SARJAPUR ROAD NEAR KSRP QUARTERS KUDLU VILLAGE BANGALORE - 560 068.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

[BY SRI DILIP KUMAR I S., ADVOCATE (AB)]

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed 1. MR. PRANAY BHARTIA by ANUSHA V S/O PRAKASH BHARTIA Location: High AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS Court of R/A NO. S-15 SAPPHIRE BLOCK Karnataka PRIME ENCLAVE VISTAS AVINASHI ROAD TIRUPPUR DISTRICT - 641 603.

¶13

SRI PRAKASH BHARTIA S/O UNKNOWN AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/A NO S-15, SAPPHIRE BLOCK PRIME ENCLAVE VISTAS AVINASHI ROAD TIRUPPUR DISTRICT - 641 603.

¶14

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:30159 WP No. 13567 of 2022

¶15

HC-KAR

¶16

SMT. MEENA BHARTIA W/O PRAKASH BHARTIA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/A NO S-15, SAPPHIRE BLOCK PRIME ENCLAVE VISTAS AVINASHI ROAD TIRUPPUR DISTRICT - 641 603.

¶17

SMT GUNJAN GOYAL W/O AVINASH GOEL AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/A T -5 141, PEBBLE BAY APARTMENT RAMAKRISHNAPPA LAYOUT DOLLARS COLONY, RMV 2^ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 094.

¶18

MR. AVINASH GOYAL S/O T C GOYAL AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/A T -5 141 PEBBLE BAY APARTMENT RAMAKRISHNAPPA LAYOUT DOLLARS COLONY, RMV 2^ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560 094.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI ANIRUDDHA J.P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI SHIRISH KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3)

¶21

THIS W.P. IS UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, FILED PRAYING TO DIRECT THE HONBLE III METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRAFFIC COURT, AT BANGALORE TO DISPOSE THE PENDING INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION VIDE ANNX-B TO F ALONG WITH MAIN PETITION VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE IN C.MISC.NO.188/2019.

¶22

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:30159 WP No. 13567 of 2022

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

None appears for petitioner.

¶28

Learned counsel for respondents no.1 and 3 has filed a memo stating that, in present petition, a direction is sought to III Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court, Bengaluru, to dispose of pending interlocutory applications in Crl. Misc. no.188/2019. Since Crl. Misc. no.188/2019 has been dismissed as withdrawn, rendering present petition infructuous.

¶29

Taking memo on record, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶30

Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

¶31

GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19

Smt. Kanupriya Bhartia v. Mr. Pranay Bhartia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Kanupriya Bhartia v. Mr. Pranay Bhartia

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnaiah H Vs Smt Kavitha v

Manjunatha Vs Smt Siddalingamma

Sudheendra K.V. Vs State of Karnataka

H. R. Varadaraja Pillai Vs State of Karnataka

Venkatesh a M Vs Oba Reddy

The State of Karnataka Vs Mammade