Dismissed¶79

Shivappa v. Yellamma

Karnataka HC21 Apr 2026WP/12100/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; WP No. 12100 of 2026 (GM-CPC); Article 227 of the Constitution of India; writ of certiorari; order dated 10.04.2026 in FDP No.3/2017 of Senior Civil and JMFC Soraba; Annexure-H1; direction to trial court to pass order on Commissioner report; dismissal as infructuous; subsequent event of disposal of suit; all contentions left open; pending applications disposed; parties from Soraba Taluk, Shivamogga District; H.T. Narendra Prasad, J.; decision dated 21 April 2026.

What did the court decide?

None; petition dismissed as infructuous with all contentions of the parties left open and pending applications disposed of. ¶79

Shivappa Vs Yellamma — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:21499 WP No. 12100 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 12100 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SHIVAPPA S/O BASAVANYAPPA HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDENT OF JADE VILLGE SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577429.

¶9

&PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

YELLAMMA

¶13

HINDU D/O BASAVANNA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

¶14

Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA

¶15

2. SUNANDAMMA

¶16

W/O KOTRAPPA

¶17

HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

¶18

R1 AND R2 ARE RESIDENTS OF KAATHUVALLI AANAVATTI HOBALI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577429.

¶19

RENUKAMMA

¶20

W/O KEREYAPPA

¶21

HINDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS HAAY RESIDENTS

¶22

KUPPAGADDE HOBALI

¶23

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:21499 WP No. 12100 of 2026

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

SORABA TALUK-577429.

¶26

SUSHEELAMMA

¶27

W/O LAKSHMANAPPA

¶28

HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS JADE RESIDENT, SORABA TALUK

¶29

MANJAPPA

¶30

S/O BASAVANYAPPA

¶31

HINDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS DEAD REP. THROUGH LRS

¶32

KAMALAMMA

¶33

W/O MANJAPPA

¶34

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS HOUSE WIFE

¶35

GANGAMMA

¶36

D/O MANJAPPA

¶37

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

¶38

SHIVALEELA

¶39

D/O MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS HOUSE WIFE.

¶40

RAJENDRA

¶41

S/O MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS AGRICULTURALIST

¶42

SHILPA

¶43

D/O MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS HOUSE WIFE

¶44

CHETHANAA

¶45

D/O MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS HOUSE WIFE

¶46

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:21499 WP No. 12100 of 2026

¶47

HC-KAR

¶48

R5 TO R10 ARE RESIDENT OF KAATHAVALLI VILLAGE

¶49

ANAVATTI HOBALI, SORABA TALUK

¶50

CHANDRAPPA S/O BASAVANYAPPA

¶51

HINDU

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

GUTHYAMMA

D/O GUDDAPPAPPA LRS

NAAGARAJU S/O GUDDAPPA

¶56

HINDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

¶57

TUKAPPA

¶58

S/O GUDDAPPA

¶59

HINDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

¶60

RAVI S/O GUDAPPA HINDU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

¶61

SOMAMMA

¶62

D/O CHIKAPPA

¶63

HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

¶64

R11 TO R15 ARE R/AT KAATHAVALLI, ANAVATTI HOBALI SORABA TALUK

¶65

SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577429.

¶66

NEELAMMA D/O BASAVARAPPA HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

¶67

RESIDENT OF LAKMAPURA

¶68

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:21499 WP No. 12100 of 2026

¶69

HC-KAR

¶70

HAANAGAL TALUK HAVERI DISTRICT-577429.

¶71

GANGAMMA

¶72

D/O NAAGENDRAPPA

¶73

HINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS HEAD MASTER R/AT NAGAVADI THUTHURU POST SORABA TALUK-577429.

¶74

&RESPONDENTS

¶75

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL AND JMFC SORABA DATED 10.04.2026 IN FDP NO.3/2017 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-H1 AND TO DIRECT THE TRIAL COURT TO PASS AN ORDER ON COMMISSIONER REPORT AND PRAY TO PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HON9BLE COURT DEEMS FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.

¶76

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

¶77

ORAL ORDER

¶78

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the subsequent event, i.e., the suit itself has been disposed of, the prayer sought by the petitioner does not survive for consideration.

¶79

In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶80

All the contentions of the parties are left open.

¶81

NC: 2026:KHC:21499 WP No. 12100 of 2026

¶82

¶83

HC-KAR

¶84

In view of disposal of the main matter, all pending

¶85