Dr H N Anand Vs the Sub Registrar

DR. H.N. ANAND S/O H. NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, NO. 16, CHYVELAH VALE, GLOWETH, TRURO, TR13YL, UK REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SMT. PRABHA HEGDE, W/O S.G. BHAT AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O NO. 14, B.T.M LAYOUT, 6TH STAGE, 1ST PHASE, (NEAR MARUTHI DENTAL COLLEGE) BDA LAYOUT, HULIMAVU BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE - 76 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

THE SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE OF THE SUB REGISTRAR, B.T.M LAYOUT NO. 12, 100 FEET ROAD, 1st PHASE, BTM LAYOUT, OPP TO WATER TANK BUS STAND,

¶12

2 -

¶13

NC: 2026:KHC:26358 WP No. 12081 of 2026

HC-KAR

BANGALORE - 29.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA)

¶18

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER AND DECIDE UPON THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DATED 18.02.2026 AT ANNX-A IN THE LIGHT OF THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.11.2025 PASSED BY THE XXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU (CCH-36) IN OS NO. 5243/2018 AT ANNX-B WITHIN A TIME FRAME DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THIS HONBLE COURT.

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent.

¶22

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

¶23

“1. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the Respondent authority to consider and decide upon the

¶24

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:26358 WP No. 12081 of 2026

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

Petitioner's representation dated 18/02/2026 at Annexure-A in the light of the judgement and decree dated 06/11/2025 passed by the XXXV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-36) in OS No.5243/2018 at Annexure-B within a time-frame deemed appropriate by this Hon'ble Court.

¶27

ii. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, including any consequential orders, in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶28

In a suit filed by the petitioner in O.S.No.5243/2018 connected with O.S.No.6502/2018, the XXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-36), by judgment and decree dated 06.11.2025, declared the Sale Deed dated 27.02.2018 and the Rectification Deed dated 21.03.2018 as null and void, having been vitiated by fraud. Pursuant to the said judgment and decree, the petitioner submitted a representation on 18.02.2026 to the respondent to effect the necessary cancellation.

¶29

The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite the said judgment and decree and the representation submitted, the Sub-Registrar has not carried out the

¶30

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:26358 WP No. 12081 of 2026

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

necessary entries, and it is for that reason that the petitioner is before this Court seeking for the aforesaid reliefs.

¶33

When a judgment has been passed by a Court, it is required of the Government authorities to comply with the said judgment as soon as possible. The judgment has been passed on 06.11.2025 and the same was brought to the notice of the Sub-Registrar on 18.02.2026. For period of nearly four months, the said representation and judgment have not been acted upon.

¶34