The petitioner sought to challenge an OTS letter dated 26.03.2020 prescribing a time limit for payment and to direct the bank to extend 90 days' time to pay the OTS amount. The petition was withdrawn as infructuous after the petitioner approached the appropriate tribunal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; interlocutory application does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:51273 WP No. 12074 of 2024
CNR: KAHC010248382024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.PRAMOD WRIT PETITION NO.12074 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MR. N. NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS NO.94, ANR KALAYANA MANTAPPA ANEKAL ROAD, CHANDAPURA BENGALURU-560 081
…PETITIONER
(BY MISS AAKANKSHA A., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SIRI R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
CHIEF MANAGER BANK OF MAHARASHTRA ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH IST FLOOR, NO.15, POLICE STATION ROAD BENGALURU-560 004
Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE OTS LETTER OF RESPONDENT DATED 26.03.2020 BEARING NO.AK78/ARB/NARAYAN REDDY GROUP /OTS SANCTION/202324, VIDE ANNEXURE-A PRESCRIBING THE TIME LIMIT WHILE EXTENDING THE OTS AS ARBITRARY SO FAR A PETITIONER CONCERN AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 27.03.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-B BY EXTENDING 90 DAYS' TIME TO PAY THE OTS AMOUNT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.PRAMOD
HC-KAR
NC: 2026:KHC:51273 WP No. 12074 of 2024
CNR: KAHC010248382024
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has field a memo dated 18.09.2026 seeking withdrawal of the petition as having become infructuous stating that the prayer sought in the petition has rendered infructuous, since the petitioner has already approached the appropriate
Tribunal. The said memo reads as under:
''The petitioner's counsel most humbly request to withdraw this writ petition as the matter has become infructous and the petitioner's have approached the appropriate tribunal.''
withdrawn as having become infructuous.
No.1/2024 does not survive for consideration.
Sd/(B.PRAMOD) JUDGE
Bsv/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. N. Narayana Reddy
Chief Manager Bank of Maharashtra Asset Recovery Branch
B. Pramod
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
