Dismissed¶33

Smt. Manjula T R v. Canara Bank

Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 – Auction sale notice – Maintainability

Karnataka HC19 Jan 2026WP/1168/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of writ petition challenging SARFAESI-style auction sale notice (Annexure-A) dated 15.12.2025 under Rule 8(6) and 9 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002; Article 226 petition held not maintainable for failure to exhaust equally efficacious remedy; Canara Bank auction fixed 20.01.2026; Karnataka High Court (GM-DRT), single-judge oral order of Ashok S.Kinagi J.; liberty reserved to pursue challenge elsewhere.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the impugned notice if so desired, and pending applications disposed of accordingly. ¶33

Smt. Manjula T R Vs Canara Bank — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:2798 WP No. 1168 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 1168 OF 2026 (GM-DRT)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. MANJULA T R W/O L. MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A OLD BOMMANAKATTE MAIN ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577204

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. SRIKANTH N V., ADV.)

¶12

Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

AND:

¶14

CANARA BANK

¶15

REGISTERED UNDER COMPANY ACT 1956 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, REGISTERED OFFICED AT NO.112, JC ROAD, BANGALORE-560002

¶16

BRANCH OFFICE AT RIPPONPET BRANCH, BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER SHIVAMOGGA-577426

¶17

SMT. SHANTHAMMA W/O LATE RAMACHANDRAPPA,

¶18

VASANTH, S/O LATE RAMACHANDRAPPA,

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:2798 WP No. 1168 of 2026

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

PRASANNA, S/O LATE RAMACHANDRAPPA

¶22

VIJAY KUMAR S/O LATE RAMACHANDRAPPA

¶23

SHOBHA, W/O RAVI, D/O LATE RAMACHANDRAPPA, THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 6 ARE R/A THUDIPETE, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577228

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE AUCTION SALE NOTICE DATED 15.12.2025 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BANK THEREBY AUCTION THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY ON 20.01.2026 AS RULE 8(6) AND 9 OF THE SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES, 2002 AS PER ANNEXURE – A, AND ETC.,

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

¶28

NC: 2026:KHC:2798 WP No. 1168 of 2026

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶31

ORAL ORDER

¶32

The petitioner filed this writ petition challenging the sale notice issued under Rule 8(6) and 9 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. The petitioner without exhausting equal efficacious remedy has field this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is not maintainable.

¶33