Dismissed

Sri K v. Naidu v the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC17 Sept 2026WP/1139/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash FIR proceedings. During preliminary hearing, the petitioner's counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the court after the filing of the charge sheet. The court accepted the memo and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the court after the filing of the charge sheet.

Sri K v Naidu Vs the State of Karnataka — Quashing and FIR | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:50914 WP No. 1139 of 2022

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

CNR: KAHC010027472022

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 1139 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. K.V. NAIDU S/O K.C. NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO.13, 4^TH CROSS, GOWDARA COLONY, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, RMV 2^ND STAGE, DOLLARS COLONY, BENGALURU-560094

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. MADAN N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NANJA REDDY P.N., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS YELAHANKA NEW TOWN POLICE STATION, BENGALURU-560064

¶16

SMT. PADMAVATHI W/O LATE M.V. ASWATHNARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.1637, 4^TH MAIN, SANIDA NILAYA, JUDICIAL LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560064

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M., HCGP FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; NOTICE SERVED ON RESPONDENT NO.2)

¶19

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

NC: 2026:KHC:50914 WP No. 1139 of 2022

¶22

CNR: KAHC010027472022

¶23

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN FIR IN CR.NO.0302/2021 DATED 21.12.2021 PENDING BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT (ANNEXURE-H) AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 21 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY HAS BEEN INFRINGED AND ETC.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶28

"The petitioner in the above case respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition with a liberty to approach this Hon'ble Court after the filing of charge sheet (Investigation).

¶29

The same may be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity"

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:50914 WP No. 1139 of 2022

¶32

¶33

CNR: KAHC010027472022

¶34

Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as

¶35

withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶36

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶37

BKN

¶38

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2

Sri K v. Naidu v the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri K v. Naidu v the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases