Dismissed¶32

Ms. Nupur Sancheti v. Jain Centre of Management Studies (Cms)

Karnataka HC8 Apr 2026WP/11363/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Attendance shortage 40% vs 75% requirement; hall ticket denial; final semester BBA examination; Jain Centre of Management Studies; Jain (Deemed to be University); medical certificate ill-health Annexure-C; representation dated 23.03.2026 Annexure-B; no interference in academic matters; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; EDN-EX; dismissed; Justice E.S. Indiresh; Karnataka High Court Bengaluru; decided 08-04-2026.

What did the court decide?

The minimum attendance requirement under the regulation of respondent No.1-College is 75% to qualify for the examination. ¶32

Ms. Nupur Sancheti Vs Jain Centre of Management… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:19514 WP NO.11363 OF 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 08^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.11363 OF 2026 (EDN-EX)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MS. NUPUR SANCHETI D/O AMAN SANCHETI, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.8151, TOWER-8, EMBASSY LAKE TERRACES, HEBBAL, BENGALURU - 560 024.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. NARENDRA S., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

JAIN CENTRE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES (CMS) REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, NO.133, LALBAGH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027.

¶15

JAIN (DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY) REP. BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR, NO.44/4, DISTRICT FUND ROAD, JAYANAGAR 9^TH BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 069.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23^RD MARCH, 2026 VIDE ANNEXUREB BY ISSUING THE HALL TICKET AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:19514 WP NO.11363 OF 2026

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

TO WRITE HER FINAL SEMESTER EXAMINATION OF BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; AND ETC.

¶22

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for direction to the respondent No.1-College to consider the representation dated 23^rd March, 2026 (Annexure-B) and to permit the petitioner to write her final semester examination of Bachelor of Business Administration.

¶25

Heard Sri. Narendra S., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶26

Sri. Narendra S., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner got 40% attendance as

¶27

against 75% requirement as per the regulation of the respondent No.1-College. Learned counsel further submits that the shortage of attendance of the petitioner was neither willful nor deliberate, but due to the ill-health. In this regard, he invited the attention of the Court to Medical Certificate produced at Annexure-C and accordingly, sought for interference of this Court.

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:19514 WP NO.11363 OF 2026

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the

¶32

petitioner, the minimum requirement of attendance as per the regulation of the respondent No.1-College is 75% to qualify for the examination. Taking into consideration the petitioner is studying Bachelor of Business Administration, which requires constant knowledge through attending the class regularly and that apart, as the petitioner had attended the classes for about only 40%, I am of the view that, no interference be called for in the academic matters. Accordingly, writ petition is

¶33

dismissed.

¶34

SD/(E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶35

ARK List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1

Ms. Nupur Sancheti v. Jain Centre of Management Studies (Cms)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms. Nupur Sancheti v. Jain Centre of Management Studies (Cms)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Kumar @ Prem Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri.Srinivasaiah C Vs the State of Karnataka

Raju Sunar @ Raju Vs State of Karnataka

Sri.Nagaraju Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Gurubasaveshwara Devasthana Vs State of Karnataka

Sathyananda Vs D.K.Varthakara Vividhodhodhesha