Smt T Zeenath Begum v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: Karnataka HC, M.I. Arun J, writ petitions disposed, LB-BMP, BBMP / Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA), unauthorised/illegal construction without sanctioned plan, building bye-laws violation, 'B' Khata to 'A' Khata conversion, sanction plan application, confirmation order ZC/E/CO/15/25-26 dated 30.06.2025, Section 248(3) and 356(1) BBMP Act 2020, Zonal Commissioner East Zone, certiorari sought but not granted, interim protection against demolition/precipitative action, complainant's hearing mandated, Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India, Farida Shoes Limited, Zeenath Begum, March 2026.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to petitioner in W.P.No.22357/2025 to apply (within three weeks) for conversion of 'B' Khata into 'A' Khata and for a sanctioned plan; authorities to consider such applications in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders; interim bar on precipitative action against that petitioner and on additional construction; hearing to be afforded to the petitioner in W.P.No.11306/2025 before any order is passed. Neither petition was adjudicated on merits; the confirmation order under Sections 248(3)/356(1) BBMP Act 2020 was not quashed.